Predicting Sample Size Required for Classification Performance

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Predicting Sample Size Required for Classification Performance

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Predicting Sample Size Required for Classification Performance
Author: Figueroa, Rosa L; Zeng-Treitler, Qing; Kandula, Sasikiran; Ngo, Long H.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Figueroa, Rosa L, Qing Zeng-Treitler , Sasikiran Kandula, and Long H Ngo. 2012. Predicting sample size required for classification performance. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12: 8.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Supervised learning methods need annotated data in order to generate efficient models. Annotated data, however, is a relatively scarce resource and can be expensive to obtain. For both passive and active learning methods, there is a need to estimate the size of the annotated sample required to reach a performance target. Methods: We designed and implemented a method that fits an inverse power law model to points of a given learning curve created using a small annotated training set. Fitting is carried out using nonlinear weighted least squares optimization. The fitted model is then used to predict the classifier's performance and confidence interval for larger sample sizes. For evaluation, the nonlinear weighted curve fitting method was applied to a set of learning curves generated using clinical text and waveform classification tasks with active and passive sampling methods, and predictions were validated using standard goodness of fit measures. As control we used an un-weighted fitting method. Results: A total of 568 models were fitted and the model predictions were compared with the observed performances. Depending on the data set and sampling method, it took between 80 to 560 annotated samples to achieve mean average and root mean squared error below 0.01. Results also show that our weighted fitting method outperformed the baseline un-weighted method (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This paper describes a simple and effective sample size prediction algorithm that conducts weighted fitting of learning curves. The algorithm outperformed an un-weighted algorithm described in previous literature. It can help researchers determine annotation sample size for supervised machine learning.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-8
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307431/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8715714
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters