Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHutt, Peter Bartonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBradt, Andrewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T20:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.citationNot Its Crowning Glory: Obstacles for FDA in Regulating Ingested Dietary Supplements Purporting to Prevent Hair Loss (2005 Third Year Paper)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8852110
dc.description.abstractPreventing hair loss is big business in the United States, amounting to over one billion dollars per year. While the industry is dominated by FDA-approved medications, like Propecia and Rogaine and hair transplant surgeries, there are also a variety of herbal remedies on the market with no proof of effectiveness. These products are allowed to exist and to claim to regrow hair or prevent future hair loss thanks to the provisions of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, or DSHEA. This article examines how DSHEA allows these products to remain on the market, potentially defrauding millions of vulnerable Americans seeking to respond to baldness, and offers several possible solutions to the problem.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectFood and Drug Lawen
dc.subjecthair lossen
dc.titleNot Its Crowning Glory: Obstacles for FDA in Regulating Ingested Dietary Supplements Purporting to Prevent Hair Lossen
dc.typePaper (for course/seminar/workshop)en_US
dc.date.available2012-06-07T20:09:01Z
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedBradt, Andrew


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record