Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZittrain, Jonathan L.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-05T19:24:46Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationJonathan Zittrain, 10 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 495 (1997).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0897-3393en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9696318
dc.description.abstract"Sysop" has gone from a term of art known only to the bleeding-edge few to a dusty anachronism known only to the bleeding-gums few, without the usual years-long general linguistic acceptance and respect in between. In case the reader is not among the bleeders: sysops (from "system operators") run electronic areas accessible by typing furiously on one’s networked computer, through which one can meet, talk to (well, at least type at), and develop nuanced social relationships with other people similarly typing and reading. Few know what a sysop is because these electronic areas — aspirationally, and sometimes accurately, known as "online communities" — have never quite flourished and today are in decline. Indeed, "online community" joins "sysop" in the oversize dustbin of trite or hopelessly esoteric, hence generally meaningless, cyberspace vernacular. Not that "online community" is obscure, like "sysop"; rather, the term’s emptiness results from its abuse. "Online community" is used by Internet companies the way a motivational speaker uses "excellence," an academic uses "new paradigm," or a lawyer uses "justice": it represents something once craved and still invoked (if only as a linguistic placeholder) even as it is believed by all but the most naïve to be laughably beyond reach. Since it’s applied to almost anything, it now means vague warm fuzzies and nothing more. The craft of sysoping and the phenomenon of online community (non-hollowly defined) have gone down together even as the Internet has burgeoned, and I want to explain what has happened to sysops as a way of explaining what has happened to the truly great and transformative promise of online communities. Law has played a major role in two distinct ways. First, sysops and the members of the communities they lead have struggled through lawlike reflection to arrive at just solutions to the disputes that inevitably arise in the course of their interactions. This struggle is a large part of what has made the communities so interesting. Second, fear of the formalistic application of the machinery of the real-world legal system is threatening to drive the amateur sysop to extinction and thereby to destroy what’s left of online community.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHarvard Law Schoolen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.jolt.law.harvard.edu/article/pdf/v10/10HarvJLTech495.pdfen_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/1997/Rise_and_Fall_of_Sysopdomen_US
dash.licenseOAP
dc.titleThe Rise and Fall of Sysopdomen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.relation.journalHarvard Journal of Law & Technologyen_US
dash.depositing.authorZittrain, Jonathan L.
dc.date.available2012-10-05T19:24:46Z
dash.contributor.affiliatedZittrain, Jonathan


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record