Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods

View/ Open
Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142910Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Chetty, Raj. 2009. Sufficient statistics for welfare analysis: a bridge between structural and reduced-form methods. Annual Review of Economics 1:451-488.Abstract
The debate between structural and reduced-form approaches has generated substantial controversy in applied economics. This article reviews a recent literature in public economics that combines the advantages of reduced-form strategies—transparent and credible identification—with an important advantage of structural models—the ability to make predictions about counterfactual outcomes and welfare. This literature has developed formulas for the welfare consequences of various policies that are functions of reduced-form elasticities rather than structural primitives. I present a general framework that shows how many policy questions can be answered by estimating a small set of sufficient statistics using program-evaluation methods. I use this framework to synthesize the modern literature on taxation, social insurance, and behavioral welfare economics. Finally, I discuss problems in macroeconomics, labor, development, and industrial organization that could be tackled using the sufficient statistic approach.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9748528
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18147]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)