Mourning Songs and Human Pasts Among the Kotas of South India Draft for submission to Asian Music (February 16, 2000) Note: “ ” = common, non-technical terms used in English, terms I have coined, and other common uses of quotation marks. ‘ ’ = literal translation of Kota terms For some fifty years now the Kotas of the Nilgiri hills have been arguing about whether or not they should celebrate the ‘dry death’ ceremony (varldv)--a memorial cremation for all men and women who have died during the year. What are the cultural and religious implications of this local argument? I hope to show that changes in rituals such as this may not only lead to changes in cultural philosophy (in this case soteriology) but may in fact be said to constitute those changes.1 In this case, by deciding to change their mortuary rituals, Kota have significantly reorganized and reconfigured components of their culture and consciousness which are crucial to the construction of identity. These include Kota perceptions of and relationships to their past(s), interpretations of cultural geography, and distribution of spiritual power to men and women. This is the second in a series of articles (cf. Wolf 1997a) attempting to illustrate how music and rituals come to actively contribute cultural meaning, either by affecting other cultural domains or by serving as unique exemplars. This article attempts to locate cultural change within the possibilities of a local cultural system. In several forthcoming articles, I will extend and broaden the arguments presented here about music and emotional ambivalence. 1 1 The Kotas number about 1500, speak a distinct and ancient Dravidian language and live in seven villages, scattered widely throughout the Nilgiri hills along the western borders of the southernmost Indian state of Tamilnadu.2 Most of the Kota population is now clustered within a short bus ride from Ooty city, one of the most popular tourist sites in India. Although they are classified by the government as a “tribal” people and maintain a staunch sense of cultural independence, the Kotas are also a modernized artisan-peasant community who share aspects of everday culture and religion with nearby Hindus. Kota indigenous gods are not embodied in permanent, anthropomorphic forms, as are Hindu gods, but rather, inhabit natural forms like fire, stones and trees or tools associated with hunting and metalworking--their premodern occupations. The gods inhabit homes, temples and blacksmith shops in these forms. Kota reflect upon the forms of their gods: to many of them, the association between Kota divinity, traditional, subsistence occupations and what in modern times is described as “nature,” reinforces the idea that the Kotas are a “tribal” people--indigenous, ancient, authentic, and rooted to the Nilgiri soil as its most aboriginal inhabitants. This primordialist sentiment is central to and embedded in both the symbols and the actual processes of worship. Although Kotas do not use coconuts or incense in worshipping their own ‘father’ (ayn r) and ‘mother’ (amnr) gods, they do adopt this Hindu style of worship when . worshipping Hindu deities--some of which they have incorporated into their own 2 This article is based on my own fieldwork in each of the Kota villages, but particularly in the village of Kolml where I lived and worked for two years. I have also benefitted from the opportunity to consult the fieldnotes and publications of the late Dr. David Mandelbaum, who began working with the Kotas sixty years ago and conducted regular field excursions to the Nilgiris throughout his life. 2 pantheon. For some gods, like Rangantar and Mriyamman, Kotas combine a Kota with a Hindu style form of worship. Although Kota religion is different from Hinduism in many ways, there are also many parallels: both Hindus and Kotas worship with fire, music and dance, and find it important to separate places and times of worship from those of menstruation and death (Fig. 1). Kota musical life is also compartmentalized: Kotas strictly separate music for worship and god from that associated with death and funerals. However, they also perform a less contextually specific type of dance music both for internal functions and for municipal and other occasions outside the community. Ensembles consist of two shawms, called kol, two cylindrical drums distinguished by pitch, called dobar and kin . . var, and a frame drum called taba.k (Fig. 2). t Musicians blow cascading calls on pairs of simple horns, kob, made of brass, to mark important ritual moments or to egg-on coteries of male dancers (See Fig. 4 in “Three Perspectives” article, this volume). These S- and C-shaped horns are important to the overall aesthetic and context of the musical ensemble, but play no systematic role in the creation of melody or rhythm. Kotas also use a large conical drum to signal moments of ritual and cultural importance, such as the moment of death, but there is no system of rhythm associated with it. Men are the instrumentalists but never sing on ritual occasions. Women sing devotional songs (devr pt --literally ‘god songs’) at certain ritual junctures and are the primary . singers of mourning songs, called t. (noun form from a Dravidian root which means to .l move, shake or dance) (See Fig 3). The Dry Death and Cultural Ambivalence 3 On the surface, the Kotas of some villages would appear to have given up their ‘dry death’ ceremonies for the same reasons that many other Indian communities have changed their customs: to emulate high-caste and Western models. Dry death ceremonies once included significant boisterousness, intoxication, a certain degree of sexual license, and spirited competition in an effort to capture and slaughter buffaloes. One of the reasons Kotas have abandoned the ceremony as a whole is that they have been made to feel ashamed of these practices. There is also, I believe, however, another reason: the special problems of Indian modernity have engendered among the Kotas a sense of cultural ambivalence: how are they to incorporate into their identity as modern Indians their relationship with their ancestors? This second reason is not entirely disconnected from the first: in both cases Kotas seem to be negotiating relationships with non-Kota Hindus, Hinduism, and Tamil society. They have adopted the idea that, after death, Kota souls merge with the same supreme being as do Hindus’--thus implying that at this ultimate level Kotas are just another kind of Hindu. Others oppose the collapsing of Kota into Hindu identity, believing strongly in a distinctively Kota afterworld and in the necessity of completing all the traditional mortuary rites. For these people, the rituals involved in creating and maintaining relationships to the dead are crucial expressions of Kota identity--a Kota identity in which, in life as in death, the Kotas are unique. Since the dry death ceremony has been discussed at great length in David Mandelbaum’s article, “Form, Variation, and Meaning in a Ceremony,” I will not attempt again to explicate all the details of this complex event. Mandelbaum wished to describe the mortuary aspect of Kota 4 life and develop a set of methodological tools for examining general questions of form and meaning in ritual. My intention in this article is not to consider social-cultural function of these death rituals per se, but rather their spectrum of significance within the range of ritual symbols in one society. I am interested particularly in that aspect of ritual symbolism which relates to a community’s construction and subjective experience of the past. Funerary rites and texts of mourning songs encode among the Kotas multiple, sometimes conflicting sets of perspectives on their forebears. The “human pasts” of this article are reflections about the dead, and by extension, about Kota history as it was embodied by living individuals. Because of the conflict which is probably inherent in the process of dealing with death, and because of the dynamics of Kota interaction with cultural outsiders, the “human pasts” for the Kotas are mutable, contradictory and problematic. I gave a special name to the kind of past represented in laments and referenced in funerals, the “human past,” in order to distinguish it from what I call a “divine past,” the collective memory of the Kota tribe as it is associated with the power of the gods and as it is made explicit in ceremonies for the gods (the most important among which is called devr, literally, ‘god’). In contrast with the “human past,” which is evoked with uncertainty and contradiction, the “divine past” is the result of a utopian and primordialist self-reflection. The past of funerals and laments is person-centered; that of god ceremonies is community-centered; the human past is history-centered; the divine past is mythologically-centered and timeless. Historical circumstances have led the Kotas to selectively emphasize aspects of these ritual complexes and thus 5 selectively emphasize ways of incorporating the past into the present and ethnohistory into identity. Construction of Individual vs. Community Pasts in Mortuary and Divine Rituals The ritual complex associated with death significantly emphasizes the individual: relatives of the deceased enact kinship relations (focused on the deceased) by providing ritual gifts and performing particular duties, officiants burn items associated with the dead person as an individual (or as belonging to a particular group: gender, occupation, ritual status or age), and mourners reminisce about the special qualities of the deceased. Mourning songs (t.) contain specific references to positive qualities of .l the dead person and/or retell the story of how the deceased came to his or her demise. Clearly, by banding together to perform a ritual and by enacting kinship relationships, the ties within a village and between villages are also emphasized and a complex typology of tribal solidarity can also be constructed. I wish here to highlight the attention to the individual, however, because this is one of the simple and central points of contrast between worship and death rituals. Mourning songs in particular come to preserve the memory of the individual beyond the occasion of a particular funeral. In fact they are from their inception forms of memory: composed after the event of death, they are sung informally, usually by women over sixty, in small gatherings of friends or family. Mourning songs are a means of performing and communicating memory, but they are also a means for evoking that feeling of loss associated with memory of a loved one in a generic sense. Although some of the melodies are unique, some are common to a large number of 6 songs and these latter are frequently rendered on musical instruments during funerals and dry death ceremonies--thus reminding mourners of one or more of these song texts and prompting them to remember and reflect upon the deaths of others. This process reinforces an important function of music in a funeral: to enhance and amplify the grief of the community in order that the deceased reach the other world safely. Although memory of an individual constitutes a relationship to one kind of past, there are other kinds of past referenced in funerary rituals, such as the past of the tribe as a whole. For example, it is customary in the dry death to cremate a home-made plant fiber thread along with bone relics from the funeral. The fiber is a reminder of days past, when Kota made their own clothes, and in a more general sense, were self-sufficient. Many other such artifacts and practices are included Kota funerary practices. These reminders of the past are in one sense important markers that a given practice has the special status of being a ‘ritual’ (ctrm