Tournoux, FrançoisPetersen, BodilThibault, HélèneZou, LinRaher, Michael J.Kurtz, BaptisteHalpern, Elkan F.Chaput, MiguelChao, WeiPicard, MichaelScherrer-Crosbie, Marielle2016-10-192011Tournoux, François, Bodil Petersen, Hélène Thibault, Lin Zou, Michael J. Raher, Baptiste Kurtz, Elkan F. Halpern, et al. 2011. “Validation of Noninvasive Measurements of Cardiac Output in Mice Using Echocardiography.” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24 (4) (April): 465–470. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.019.0894-7317http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29048911Although multiple echocardiographic methods exist to calculate cardiac output (CO), they have not been validated in mice using a reference method. Echocardiographic and flow probe measurements of CO were obtained in mice before and after albumin infusion and inferior vena cava occlusions. Echocardiography was also performed before and after endotoxin injection. Cardiac output was calculated using LV volumes obtained from a M Mode or a 2D view, LV stroke volume calculated using the pulmonary flow, or estimated using pulmonary VTI. Close correlations were demonstrated between flow probe-measured CO and all echocardiographic measurements of CO. All echocardiographic-derived CO overestimated the flow-probe measured CO. 2D images-derived CO was associated with the smallest overestimation of CO. Interobserver variability was lowest for pulmonary VTI derived CO. In mice, CO calculated from 2D parasternal long axis images is most accurate when compared to flow probe measurements, however, pulmonary VTI-derived CO is subject to less variability.en-USmicedoppler echocardiographycardiac outputflow probesepsisJournal Article2016-10-1910.1016/j.echo.2010.12.019