Yun, Hyuk JinMoon, Seung HwanKim, Hee JinLockhart, Samuel N.Choe, Yearn SeongLee, Kyung HanNa, Duk L.Lee, Jong-MinSeo, Sang Won2017-12-062017Yun, Hyuk Jin, Seung Hwan Moon, Hee Jin Kim, Samuel N. Lockhart, Yearn Seong Choe, Kyung Han Lee, Duk L. Na, Jong-Min Lee, and Sang Won Seo. 2017. “Centiloid method evaluation for amyloid PET of subcortical vascular dementia.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 16322. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16236-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16236-1.http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34493181Reference region selection is important for proper amyloid PET analysis, especially in subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD) patients. We investigated reference region differences between SVaD and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using Centiloid scores. In 57 [C-11] Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positive (+) AD and 23 PiB (+) SVaD patients, we assessed standardized PiB uptake and Centiloid scores in disease-specific cortical regions, with several reference regions: cerebellar gray (CG), whole cerebellum (WC), WC with brainstem (WC + B), pons, and white matter (WM). We calculated disease group differences from young controls (YC) and YC variance according to reference region. SVaD patients showed large effect sizes (Cohen’s d > 0.8) using all reference regions. WM and pons showed larger YC variances than other regions. Findings were similar for AD patients. CG, WC, and WC + B, but not WM or pons, are reliable reference regions for amyloid imaging analysis in SVaD.en-USCentiloid method evaluation for amyloid PET of subcortical vascular dementiaJournal Article2017-12-0610.1038/s41598-017-16236-1