Ettinger, A. K.Chamberlain, C. J.Morales-Castilla, I.Buonaiuto, D. M.Flynn, D. F. B.Savas, T.Samaha, J. A.Wolkovich, E. M.Wolkovich2023-02-072020-10-19Ettinger, A. K, C. J Chamberlain, I Morales-Castilla, D. M Buonaiuto, D. F. B Flynn, T Savas, J. A Samaha, and E. M Wolkovich. 2020. “Winter Temperatures Predominate in Spring Phenological Responses to Warming.” Nature Climate Change 10 (12): 1137–1142.1758-678X1758-6798https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37374250Other HU co-authors: Catherine Chamberlain Daniel BuonaiutoResearch on woody plant species highlights three major cues that shape spring phenological events: chilling, forcing, and photoperiod. Increasing research on the phenological impacts of climate change has led to debate over whether chilling and/or photoperiod cues slow phenological responses to warming in recent years. Here we use a global meta-analysis of all published experiments to test the relative effects of these cues. Almost all species show strong responses to all three cues, with chilling being the strongest, and photoperiod the weakest. Forecasts from our findings for Central Europe suggest that spring phenology will continue to advance, as stalling effects of chilling generally appear above 4 degree C warming in this region. Our results unify both sides of the debate over phenological cues: while all species may respond to all cues strongly in experimental conditions, in current environmental conditions the dominant signal of climate change is from increased forcing.en-USSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)Environmental Science (miscellaneous)Journal Article2023-02-0710.1038/s41558-020-00917-3