Person:
Landrum, Mary

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Landrum

First Name

Mary

Name

Landrum, Mary

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Survival Implications Associated with Variation in Mastectomy Rates for Early-Staged Breast Cancer
    (Hindawi Publishing, 2012) Brooks, John M.; Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.; Landrum, Mary; Wright, Kara B.; Fang, Gang; Winer, Eric; Keating, Nancy
    Despite a 20-year-old guideline from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference recommending breast conserving surgery with radiation (BCSR) over mastectomy for woman with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) because it preserves the breast, recent evidence shows mastectomy rates increasing and higher-staged ESBC patients are more likely to receive mastectomy. These observations suggest that some patients and their providers believe that mastectomy has advantages over BCSR and these advantages increase with stage. These beliefs may persist because the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that served as the basis for the NIH guideline were populated mainly with lower-staged patients. Our objective is to assess the survival implications associated with mastectomy choice by patient alignment with the RCT populations. We used instrumental variable methods to estimate the relationship between surgery choice and survival for ESBC patients based on variation in local area surgery styles. We find results consistent with the RCTs for patients closely aligned to the RCT populations. However, for patients unlike those in the RCTs, our results suggest that higher mastectomy rates are associated with reduced survival. We are careful to interpret our estimates in terms of limitations of our estimation approach.
  • Publication
    The Impact of Vertical Integration on Physician Behavior and Healthcare Delivery: Evidence from Gastroenterology Practices
    (Harvard Kennedy School, 2022-11) Saghafian, Soroush; Song, Linda D.; Newhouse, Joseph; Landrum, Mary; Hsu, John
    The U.S. healthcare system is undergoing a period of substantial change, with hospitals purchasing many physician practices (\vertical integration"). In theory, this vertical integration could improve quality by promoting care coordination, but could also worsen it by impacting the care delivery patterns. The evidence quantifying these effects is limited, because of the lack of understanding of how physicians' behaviors alter in response to the changes in financial ownership and incentive structures of the integrated organizations. We study the impact of vertical integration by examining Medicare patients treated by gastroenterologists, a specialty with a large outpatient volume, and a recent increase in vertical integration. Using a causal model and large-scale patient-level national panel data that includes 2.6 million patient visits across 5,488 physicians, we examine changes in various measures of care delivery. We nd that physicians signi ficantly alter their care process (e.g., in using anesthesia with deep sedation) after they vertically integrate, and there is a substantial increase in patients' post-procedure complications. We further provide evidence that the financial incentive structure of the integrated practices is the main reason for the changes in physician behavior, since it discourages the integrated practices from allocating expensive resources to relatively unprofi table procedures. We also nd that although integration improves operational efficiency (e.g., measured by physicians' throughput), it negatively affects quality and overall spending. Finally, to shed light on potential mechanisms through which policymakers can mitigate the negative consequences of vertical integration, we perform both mediation and cost-effectiveness analyses, and highlight some useful policy levers.