Person: Rosenberg, Charles
Loading...
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Rosenberg
First Name
Charles
Name
Rosenberg, Charles
51 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 51
Publication Back to the future(Elsevier BV, 2013) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication Disease in history, history in disease: An interview with Charles Rosenberg(Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) Rosenberg, Charles; Silverman, ChloePublication Meanings, Policies, and Medicine: On the Bioethical Enterprise and History(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1999) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication Inward Vision and Outward Glance: The Shaping of the American Hospital, 1880‑1914(Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication The Cause of Cholera: Aspects of Etiological Thought in Nineteenth Century America(Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication The Adams Act: Politics and the Cause of Scientific Research(Agricultural History Society, 1964) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication Cholera in Nineteenth-Century Europe: A Tool for Social and Economic Analysis(Cambridge University Press, 1966) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication The Practice of Medicine in New York a Century Ago(Johns Hopkins University Press, 1968) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication Science, Technology, and Economic Growth: The Case of the Agricultural Experiment Station Scientist, 1975-1914(University of California Press, 1971) Rosenberg, CharlesPublication Rationalization and Reality in the Shaping of American Agricultural Research, 1875-1914(SAGE Publications, 1977) Rosenberg, CharlesProblems in contemporary American agricultural research have origins in nineteenth-century economic and social realities and in the perceptions and responses of scientists and scientist-administrators who sought to forge careers within this context. The economic needs of agriculture in a highly competitive world market helped justify the support of would-be scientists. Emphasis on the necessary interdependence of pure science and applied science was one natural response of scientists who desired autonomy but could not question the power or legitimacy of farm and business constituencies. By 1900, growth and a policy of accommodation had begun to create conflict and even discontent in the minds of at least some scientists. However, the expanding of career options in the biological sciences, the elaboration of new applied science disciplines, the granting of generous federal support for extension (demonstration and education), and the increasing of support for research all served - in a period of institutional growth - to provide of a more varied set of career options for scientists and administrators and economic guidance for agricultural producers and agriculture-related business. Thus, America's agricultural research establishment moved into the twentieth century, rigid in ideology, wedded to a habitually compromising interaction with its client constituency - yet diverse and well-funded enough to support the varied ambitions and ideals of most scientists and administrators.