Person:
Berghorst, Lisa Hinckley

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Berghorst

First Name

Lisa Hinckley

Name

Berghorst, Lisa Hinckley
Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.12860ab4-1d06-41f0-a180-d6e1a4be7b56

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Acute Stress Selectively Reduces Reward Sensitivity
    (Frontiers Research Foundation, 2013) Berghorst, Lisa Hinckley; Bogdan, Ryan; Frank, Michael J.; Pizzagalli, Diego
    Stress may promote the onset of psychopathology by disrupting reward processing. However, the extent to which stress impairs reward processing, rather than incentive processing more generally, is unclear. To evaluate the specificity of stress-induced reward processing disruption, 100 psychiatrically healthy females were administered a probabilistic stimulus selection task (PSST) that enabled comparison of sensitivity to reward-driven (Go) and punishment-driven (NoGo) learning under either “no stress” or “stress” (threat-of-shock) conditions. Cortisol samples and self-report measures were collected. Contrary to hypotheses, the groups did not differ significantly in task performance or cortisol reactivity. However, further analyses focusing only on individuals under “stress” who were high responders with regard to both cortisol reactivity and self-reported negative affect revealed reduced reward sensitivity relative to individuals tested in the “no stress” condition; importantly, these deficits were reward-specific. Overall, findings provide preliminary evidence that stress-reactive individuals show diminished sensitivity to reward, but not punishment, under stress. While such results highlight the possibility that stress-induced anhedonia might be an important mechanism linking stress to affective disorders, future studies are necessary to confirm this conjecture.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Examining the Relationships between Stress, Reward Processing, and Bipolar Disorder
    (2013-03-08) Berghorst, Lisa Hinckley; Pizzagalli, Diego A.; Hooley, Jill Miranda; Nock, Matthew; Auerbach, Randy
    Bipolar disorder (BD) is a prevalent illness associated with severe impairments in functioning and elusive etiological pathways. Although a strong link between negative life stress and the onset of mood episodes in BD has been documented, the mechanisms underlying this connection remain unclear. A dysregulated reward system may play a prominent role in bridging these phenomena given that anhedonia and hyperhedonia are often symptoms of BD. Furthermore, emerging research suggests that negative stress influences reward responsiveness and the neurobiological substrates that regulate this system. The overarching goal of this dissertation was to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex connections between negative stress, reward processing, and BD. The first aim was to closely examine the connection between negative stress and reward processing in psychiatrically healthy individuals by investigating the specificity of the effects of stress on sensitivity to reward versus punishment, and the role of perceived control over stress. This was implemented using a probabilistic stimulus selection task, an acute ('threat-of-shock') stressor, and three between-group conditions: 'controllable stress,' 'uncontrollable stress' and 'no-stress.' Consistent with hypotheses, individuals under stress exhibited reduced reward sensitivity relative to individuals not under stress, and these deficits were reward-specific. However, this effect emerged only when participants were re-grouped based on their cortisol reactivity, suggesting that the original experimental design (including manipulation of stress controllability) was only partially successful. The second aim was to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the relationships between stress, reward processing, and BD. To this end, euthymic individuals with BD and demographically-matched controls performed a Monetary Incentive Delay task while undergoing fMRI during no-stress and stress (negative psychosocial stressor) conditions. A significant between-group difference emerged in the no-stress condition: BD subjects had lower activation than controls in the dorsal ACC during reward anticipation. This finding may translate to an impaired ability to use reward-predicting cues to appropriately engage in goal-directed actions, thus highlighting a potential neural mechanism that could underlie dysfunctional reward processing in BD. Longitudinal studies using high-risk samples are needed to evaluate whether this finding reflects a vulnerability factor for BD or an effect of the illness.