Person:

Bitton, Asaf

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Bitton

First Name

Asaf

Name

Bitton, Asaf

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication

    Toward a better understanding of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice

    (Managed Care & Healthcare Communications, 2014) Bitton, Asaf; Onega, Tracy; Tosteson, Anna N.A.; Haas, Jennifer

    Current shifts toward patient-centered healthcare and accountable payment options point to the more personalized production of better health, not just healthcare, as a next organizational paradigm. Transformation to a system geared toward promoting health requires us to think broadly about what it means to engage patients meaningfully, to give them a voice in their health and care, and to capture more of their varied experience and attitudes beyond the provider visit. The collection and use of patient-reported outcome data into electronic health records represents an important step forward for the transition to a more patient-centered health system. We set out an agenda for better understanding how and when patient-reported outcomes may improve patient health and care experience.

  • Publication

    Take the money and run? Redemption of a gift card incentive in a clinician survey

    (BioMed Central, 2016) Chen, Jane S.; Sprague, Brian L.; Klabunde, Carrie N.; Tosteson, Anna N. A.; Bitton, Asaf; Onega, Tracy; MacLean, Charles D.; Harris, Kimberly; Schapira, Marilyn M.; Haas, Jennifer

    Background: Clinician surveys provide critical information about many facets of health care, but are often challenging to implement. Our objective was to assess use by participants and non-participants of a prepaid gift card incentive that could be later reclaimed by the researchers if unused. Methods: Clinicians were recruited to participate in a mailed or online survey as part of a study to characterize women’s primary health care provider attitudes towards breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines and practices (n = 177). An up-front incentive of a $50 gift card to a popular online retailer was included with the study invitation. Clinicians were informed that the gift card would expire if it went unused after 4 months. Outcome measures included use of gift cards by participants and non-participants and comparison of hypothetical costs of different incentive strategies. Results: 63.5 % of clinicians who responded to the survey used the gift card, and only one provider who didn’t participate used the gift card (1.6 %). Many of those who participated did not redeem their gift cards (36.5 % of respondents). The price of the incentives actually claimed totaled $3700, which was less than half of the initial outlay. Since some of the respondents did not redeem their gift cards, the cost of incentives was less than it might have been if we had provided a conditional incentive of $50 to responders after they had completed the survey. Conclusions: Redeemable online gift card codes may provide an effective way to motivate clinicians to participate in surveys.