Person: Hemous, David
Loading...
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Hemous
First Name
David
Name
Hemous, David
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry(University of Chicago Press, 2016) Aghion, Philippe; Dechezleprêtre, Antoine; Hemous, David; Martin, Ralf; Van Reenen, JohnCan directed technical change be used to combat climate change? We construct new firm-level panel data on auto industry innovation distinguishing between "dirty" (internal combustion engine) and "clean" (e.g. electric and hybrid) patents across 80 countries over several decades. We show that firms tend to innovate relatively more in clean technologies when they face higher tax-inclusive fuel prices. Furthermore, there is path dependence in the type of innovation both from aggregate spillovers and from the firm's own innovation history. Using our model we simulate the increases in carbon taxes needed to allow clean to overtake dirty technologies.Publication The Environment and Directed Technical Change(2009) Acemoglu, Daron; Aghion, Philippe; Bursztyn, Leonardo; Hemous, DavidThis paper introduces endogenous and directed technical change in a growth model with environmental constraints and limited resources. A unique final good is produced by combining inputs from two sectors. One of these sectors uses "dirty" machines and thus creates environmental degradation. Research can be directed to improving the technology of machines in either sector. We characterize dynamic tax policies that achieve sustainable growth or maximize intertemporal welfare, as a function of structural characteristics of the economy, in particular the degree of substitutability between clean and dirty inputs, environmental and resource stocks, and cross-country technological spillovers. First, we find that factoring in directed technical change: (i) increases the cost of delaying intervention, particularly when the inputs are highly substitutable; (ii) calls for the use of profit taxes or other instruments to direct innovation, in addition to the input (carbon) tax emphasized in the literature. Second, we show that: (i) in the case where the inputs are sufficiently substitutable, sustainable long-run growth can be achieved with temporary taxation of dirty innovation and production; (ii) the sooner and the stronger is the policy response, the shorter is the slow growth transition phase; (iii) the use of an exhaustible resource in dirty input production helps the switch to clean innovation under laissez-faire when the two inputs are substitutes. Third, we find that under reasonable parameter values (corresponding to those used in existing models with exogenous technology) and with sufficient substitutability between inputs, it is optimal to redirect technical change towards clean technologies immediately. Finally, in a two-country extension of the baseline model where: (a) the two inputs are sufficiently substitutable in both countries; (b) dirty input production in both countries depletes the global environmental stock; (c) the South imitates technologies invented in the North, we show that taxing dirty innovation and production in the North only may be sufficient to avoid a global disaster, but international trade increases the need for global policy coordination.