Person:
Shahawy, Sarrah

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Shahawy

First Name

Sarrah

Name

Shahawy, Sarrah

Filters

20162

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.31e92955-e423-48c1-8eb0-cdea57e17244

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Attitudes of Palestinian medical students on the geopolitical barriers to accessing hospitals for clinical training: a qualitative study
    (BioMed Central, 2016) Shahawy, Sarrah; Diamond, Megan
    Background: The movement of Palestinians in the occupied Palestinian territories is restricted by bureaucratic and physical obstacles. To date, no studies have examined the barriers that Palestinian medical students face in accessing hospitals for clinical training. The objectives of this study were to characterize these barriers and understand how they affect Palestinian students’ medical education and quality of life. Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 4th-6th year medical students from Al-Quds University to participate in focus group discussions. A total of 36 students participated in the discussions. Transcripts of the discussions were coded to identify major themes. Results: Palestinian medical students expressed facing numerous challenges during their clinical training. Students emphasized the difficulties of obtaining permits to train at Jerusalem hospitals, including arbitrary permit rejections and long wait times. Significant delays, searches, and mistreatment at checkpoints during their commute to hospitals were particularly burdensome. The majority of students who participated in the focus groups felt that their education and quality of life had been strongly negatively affected by their experience trying to access hospital training sites. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that medical students living and studying in the occupied Palestinian territories receive sub-optimal training due to ambiguous permit rules, barriers at checkpoints, and the psychological burden of the process. These results highlight the impact that military occupation has on the education and quality of life of Palestinian medical students in a setting in which there is regular violence and many health indicators are already poor. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13031-016-0067-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    Perspectives on Elective Abortion Among Palestinian Women: Religion, Culture and Access in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
    (2016-05-17) Shahawy, Sarrah
    Background: Termination of pregnancy remains a highly debated topic in women’s health in the Middle East and specifically in the occupied Palestinian territories (OPT), where it is illegal in most cases. To better understand the ways in which Palestinian women interface with a healthcare system governed by an Israeli system in certain places and limited by the Israeli occupation in others, and to reconcile religious, ethical, and social challenges in this context, this study is designed to elicit the views of Palestinian women exclusively on elective abortion. To our knowledge, this would be the first study exploring women’s views on abortion in Palestine to specifically include the dual sociopolitical context of Jerusalem in which Israeli laws govern healthcare. Methods: We designed a qualitative study that used convenience sampling to recruit Palestinian women (patient and non-patient) from the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Al-Makassed Islamic Charitable Hospital in East Jerusalem. After obtaining verbal informed consent, participants were interviewed in Arabic one-on-one using an open-ended questionnaire eliciting perceptions on the religious implications, social consequences and accessibility of elective abortions in the OPT. Interviews were transcribed and translated to English. Two members of the research team open-coded the transcripts of the interviews. Codes were identified independently then refined collaboratively to finalize a list of reoccurring themes. Data was analyzed using MAXQDA 11. Results: Sixty women were interviewed, ranging in age from 18-70, living in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza. The majority of participants were Muslim, married, urban dwellers, with a high school education or less, and with at least 3 children. Themes arising from the interviews included the centrality of religion and religious authorities in affecting women’s choices and views on abortion, the importance of community norms in regulating perspectives on and access to elective abortion, and the effect of the unique medico-legal situation of the OPT on access to abortion under occupation. Many women expressed opposition to abortion on religious and cultural grounds with most excepting to save a woman’s life. Participants diverged most widely in their views on abortion in the cases of fetal anomalies, pre-marital pregnancy, and rape. Limitations identified to safe abortion access by Palestinian women included: legal restrictions, hospital policy restrictions, prohibitive prices at private clinics, significant social consequences from the discovery of an abortion by one’s community or family, and different levels of access to abortion depending on whether women were residents of Jerusalem, the West Bank, or Gaza. Conclusions: A deeper understanding of variations in religious beliefs and practices, and of the interplay between politics, religion, history and reproductive rights is crucial in the war-torn context of Palestine, as Palestinian women are subjected not only to the realities of occupation, but also to historically patriarchal social and legal structures. This study offers some insight into the views of Palestinian women on the important women’s health and human rights issue of abortion. This information can help physicians, policymakers, and women’s reproductive health and rights organizations better understand the views and needs of their constituency and how to best address them and care for their health and well-being in the intimately challenging circumstances of abortion.