Person:
Pang, Justine

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Pang

First Name

Justine

Name

Pang, Justine

Filters

20131

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.4b0a237a-93cc-4927-94c4-052734a231b0

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    Provider Use of and Attitudes Towards an Active Clinical Alert
    (Schattauer GmbH, 2013) Feblowitz, Joshua; Henkin, Stanislav; Pang, Justine; Ramelson, Harley Z.; Schneider, L.; Maloney, F. L.; Wilcox, A. R.; Bates, David; Wright, A.
    Background In a previous study, we reported on a successful clinical decision support (CDS) intervention designed to improve electronic problem list accuracy, but did not study variability of provider response to the intervention or provider attitudes towards it. The alert system accurately predicted missing problem list items based on health data captured in a patient’s electronic medical record. Objective To assess provider attitudes towards a rule-based CDS alert system as well as heterogeneity of acceptance rates across providers. Methods We conducted a by-provider analysis of alert logs from the previous study. In addition, we assessed provider opinions of the intervention via an email survey of providers who received the alerts (n = 140). Results Although the alert acceptance rate was 38.1%, individual provider acceptance rates varied widely, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 14.8%-54.4%, and many outliers accepting none or nearly all of the alerts they received. No demographic variables, including degree, gender, age, assigned clinic, medical school or graduation year predicted acceptance rates. Providers’ self-reported acceptance rate and perceived alert frequency were only moderately correlated with actual acceptance rates and alert frequency. Conclusions Acceptance of this CDS intervention among providers was highly variable but this heterogeneity is not explained by measured demographic factors, suggesting that alert acceptance is a complex and individual phenomenon. Furthermore, providers’ self-reports of their use of the CDS alerting system correlated only modestly with logged usage.