Person:
Samore, Gary

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Samore

First Name

Gary

Name

Samore, Gary

Filters

2013 - 20154

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.4b48a70a-7db8-4dd3-a16a-c5cfc502c28e

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    Cancel the Plutonium Fuel Factory
    Bunn, Matthew; Samore, Gary
    Twenty years ago, in the Clinton Administration, both of us helped launch a program to build a factory to turn the excess plutonium from dismantled nuclear weapons into fuel for nuclear reactors. At that time, the full life-cycle cost estimate to make this plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel was expected to be less than USD2 billion dollars. Now, however, with official cost estimates ballooning to over USD30 billion, it is clear that the project has become too expensive. It is time to stop throwing good money after bad and pursue cheaper alternatives that will serve our national security better.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Transcending Mutual Deterrence in the U.S.-Russian Relationship
    (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 2013) Bunn, Matthew; Kuznetsov, Valentin; Morozov, Yuri; Samore, Gary; Saradzhyan, Simon; Tobey, William; Yesin, Viktor; Zolotarev, Pavel
    Even as this paper was being written and edited, U.S.-Russian relations have warmed and chilled. Today, as we are about to go to press, marks a particularly chilly period in recent history, with the cancellation of a planned Moscow Summit in September 2013. To some, this cold spell might signal an inapt moment to consider issues related to transcending mutual deterrence. Such a view would overlook the aims of the paper, which attempts to assess the central and enduring interests of the United States and Russia, the extent to which they coincide or conflict, and whether or not in light of these interests mutual deterrence should remain a fundamental feature of the relationship. The analysis and recommendations offered below are based on a long-term view. The inevitable and transitory changes in the U.S.-Russian relationship cannot gainsay them. Indeed, at moments of temporary frustration or elation it is most important to think strategically about central and enduring national interests and how best to secure them.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    The Iran Nuclear Deal: A Definitive Guide
    (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, 2015) Samore, Gary; Bunn, Matthew; Allison, Graham; Arnold, Aaron; Burns, R.; Feldman, Shai; Freilich, Chuck; Heinonen, Olli; Malin, Martin; Miller, Steven; Mohseni, Payam; Nephew, Richard; Rockwood, Laura; Sebenius, James; Tobey, William
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Decoding the Iran Nuclear Deal: Key Questions, Points of Divergence, Pros and Cons, Pending Legislation, and Essential Facts
    (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, 2015) Samore, Gary; Allison, Graham; Bunn, Matthew; Burns, R.; Feldman, Shai; Freilich, Chuck; Heinonen, Olli; Malin, Martin; Miller, Steven; Mohseni, Payam; Rockwood, Laura; Sebenius, James; Tobey, William
    On April 2, 2015, the EU (on behalf of the P5+1 countries) and Iran announced agreement on “key parameters” for a comprehensive nuclear deal with Iran. The EU-Iran Joint Statement is buttressed by unilateral fact sheets issued by the U.S. and Iran, which provide further details of the framework accord. Not surprisingly, differences have emerged between the U.S. and Iranian versions of the deal. These differences reflect both political spin and remaining issues that have not been resolved. In the next phase of this process, the negotiators will seek to finalize a comprehensive agreement by June 30, 2015. To assist Members of Congress and others to evaluate the emerging deal, the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School has prepared this Policy Brief summarizing key facts, core concepts, and major arguments for and against the emerging deal. Amidst the sound and fury of claim and counter-claim, the purpose of this Policy Brief is not to advocate support for or opposition to the deal, but rather to provide an objective, nonpartisan summary to inform Members of Congress and others in coming to their own conclusions. The team of experts who prepared this report includes Democrats, Republicans, independents, and internationals, who have many disagreements among themselves, but who agree that this Brief presents the essentials objectively. Since the negotiations are ongoing and the debate is intensifying, we invite readers who disagree with our presentation or who have additional questions or points to send their comments to us at iran_matters@hks.harvard.edu. If suitable, we will post these contributions with attribution on our website Iran Matters.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Report of the Task Force on Nuclear Nonproliferation
    (U.S. Department of Energy, 2015) Carnesale, Albert; Bunn, Matthew; Samore, Gary