Person:

Pearson, Kimberly Hope

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Pearson

First Name

Kimberly Hope

Name

Pearson, Kimberly Hope

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Publication

    Temporal Variability and Predictors of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations in Men and Women

    (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 2007) Mahalingaiah, Shruthi; Meeker, John D.; Pearson, Kimberly Hope; Calafat, Antonia M.; Ye, Xiaoyun; Petrozza, John; Hauser, Russ

    Background: Bisphenol A (BPA) is used to manufacture polymeric materials, such as polycarbonate plastics, and is found in a variety of consumer products. Recent data show widespread BPA exposure among the U.S. population.Objective Our goal in the present study was to determine the temporal variability and predictors of BPA exposure. Methods: We measured urinary concentrations of BPA among male and female patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center. Results: Between 2004 and 2006, 217 urine samples were collected from 82 subjects: 45 women (145 samples) and 37 men (72 samples). Of these, 24 women and men were partners and contributed 42 pairs of samples collected on the same day. Ten women became pregnant during the follow-up period. Among the 217 urine samples, the median BPA concentration was 1.20 μg/L, ranging from below the limit of detection (0.4 μg/L) to 42.6 μg/L. Age, body mass index, and sex were not significant predictors of urinary BPA concentrations. BPA urinary concentrations among pregnant women were 26% higher (–26%, +115%) than those among the same women when not pregnant (p > 0.05). The urinary BPA concentrations of the female and male partner on the same day were correlated (r = 0.36; p = 0.02). The sensitivity of classifying a subject in the highest tertile using a single urine sample was 0.64. Conclusion: We found a nonsignificant increase in urinary BPA concentrations in women while pregnant compared with nonpregnant samples from the same women. Samples collected from partners on the same day were correlated, suggesting shared sources of exposure. Finally, a single urine sample showed moderate sensitivity for predicting a subject’s tertile categorization.

  • Publication

    Point of failure as a predictor of in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation

    (Elsevier BV, 2009) Pearson, Kimberly Hope; Hauser, Russ; Cramer, Daniel; Missmer, Stacey

    Among 2245 women, those who experienced a chemical pregnancy that failed to progress to a clinically recognized pregnancy or a spontaneous abortion on their first IVF cycle were more likely to discontinue IVF treatment than those whose first cycle ended prior to embryo transfer or who did not have a positive pregnancy test following transfer. However, among women who did continue to a second IVF cycle, those who had at least a chemical pregnancy on the first cycle were more likely to have a live birth on the second attempt than those women who had failed prior to conception in the first cycle (34% success rate compared to 21%, respectively).

  • Publication

    Analysis of Multiple-cycle Data From Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization

    (Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2011) Missmer, Stacey; Pearson, Kimberly Hope; Ryan, Louise; Meeker, John D.; Cramer, Daniel; Hauser, Russ

    The number of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the U.S. increased from fewer than 46,000 in 1995 to more than 120,000 in 2005. IVF and other assisted reproductive technology (ART) data are routinely collected and used to identify outcome predictors. However, researchers do not always make full use of the data due to its complexity. Design approaches have included restriction to first-cycle attempts only, which reduces power and identifies effects only of those factors associated with initial success. Many statistical techniques have been utilized or proposed for analysis of IVF data, ranging from simple t-tests to sophisticated models designed specifically for IVF. We apply several of these methods to data from a prospective cohort of 2687 couples undergoing ART from 1994 through 2003. Results across methods are compared and the appropriateness of the various methods is discussed with the intent to illustrate methodologic validity. We observed a remarkable similarity of coefficient estimates across models. However, each method for dealing with multiple cycle data relies on assumptions that may or may not be expected to hold in a given IVF study. The robustness and reported magnitude of effect for individual predictors of IVF success may be inflated or attenuated due to violation of statistical assumptions, and should always be critically interpreted. Given that risk factors associated with IVF success may also advance our understanding of the physiologic processes underlying conception, implantation, and gestation, the application of valid methods to these complex data is critical.