Person:

Green, Robert

Purpose To measure the frequency of prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (DTC-PGT) and their association with the pharmacogenomic results received. Methods: New DTC-PGT customers were enrolled in 2012 and completed surveys prior to return of results and 6 months post-results; DTC-PGT results were linked to survey data. ‘Atypical response’ pharmacogenomic results were defined as those indicating an increase or decrease in risk of an adverse drug event or likelihood of therapeutic benefit. At follow-up, participants reported prescription medication changes and health care provider consultation. Results: Follow-up data were available from 961 participants, of which 54 (5.6%) reported changing a medication they were taking, or starting a new medication, due to their DTC-PGT results. Of these, 45 (83.3%) reported consulting with a health care provider regarding the change. Pharmacogenomic results were available for 961 participants, of which 875 (91.2%) received ≥1 atypical response result. For each such result received, the odds of reporting a prescription medication change increased 1.57 times (95% confidence interval = 1.17, 2.11). Conclusion: Receipt of pharmacogenomic results indicating atypical drug response is common with DTC-PGT, and associated with prescription medication changes; however, fewer than 1% of consumers report unsupervised changes at 6 months post-testing.

Purpose American adult adoptees may possess limited amounts of information about their biological families and turn to direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (PGT) for genealogical and medical information. We investigated the motivations and outcomes of adoptees undergoing PGT using data from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study. Methods: The PGen Study surveyed new 23andMe and Pathway Genomics customers prior to and 6 months after receiving PGT results. Exploratory analyses compared adoptees’ and non-adoptees’ PGT attitudes, expectations, and experiences. We evaluated the association of adoption status with motivations for testing and post-disclosure actions using logistic regression models. Results: Of 1607 participants, 80 (5%) were adopted. As compared to non-adoptees, adoptees were more likely to cite limited family health history knowledge (OR = 10.1; 95% CI = 5.7–19.5) and the opportunity to learn genetic disease risks (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6–4.8) as strong motivations for PGT. Of 922 participants who completed 6-month follow-up, there was no significant association between adoption status and PGT-motivated healthcare utilization or health behavior change. Conclusion: PGT allows adoptees to gain otherwise inaccessible information about their genetic disease risks and ancestry, helping them to fill the void of an incomplete family health history.

Purpose To measure changes to genetics knowledge and self-efficacy following personal genomic testing (PGT). Methods: New customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics completed a series of online surveys. Prior to receipt of results, and 6 months post-results, we measured genetics knowledge (9 true/false items) and genetics self-efficacy (5 Likert-scale items) and used paired methods to evaluate change over time. Correlates of change (e.g., decision regret) were identified using linear regression. Results: 998 PGT customers (59.9% female; 85.8% White; mean age 46.9±15.5 years) were included in our analyses. Mean genetics knowledge score out of 9 was 8.15±0.95 at baseline and 8.25±0.92 at 6 months (p = .0024). Mean self-efficacy score out of 35 was 29.06±5.59 at baseline and 27.7±5.46 at 6 months (p < .0001); on each item, 30–45% of participants reported lower self-efficacy following PGT. Change in self-efficacy was positively associated with health care provider consultation (p = .0042), impact of PGT on perceived control over one’s health (p < .0001), and perceived value of PGT (p < .0001), and negatively associated with decision regret (p < .0001). Conclusion: Lowered genetics self-efficacy following PGT may reflect an appropriate reevaluation by consumers in response to receiving complex genetic information.