Person:

Cheng, Su-Chun

Background: Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been published and disseminated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. Few studies have examined the rates of adherence to these guidelines in eligible populations and the influence of age and gender on highly effective AMI treatments in community hospital settings.

Methods: Medical records of 2409 individuals admitted to 37 Minnesota hospitals between October 1992 and July 1993 for AMI, suspected AMI, or rule-out AMI, and meeting electrocardiographic, laboratory, and clinical criteria suggestive of AMI were reviewed to determine the proportion of eligible patients who received thrombolytic, β-blocker, aspirin, and lidocaine hydrochloride therapy. The effects of patient age, gender, and hospital teaching status on the use of these treatments were estimated using logistic regression models.

Results: Eligibility for treatment ranged from 68% (n=1627) for aspirin therapy, 38% (n=906) for lidocaine therapy, and 30% (n=734) for thrombolytic therapy to 19% (n=447) for β-blocker therapy. Seventy-two percent of patients eligible to receive a thrombolytic agent received this therapy; 53% received β-blockers; 81% received aspirin; and 88% received lidocaine. Among patients ineligible for lidocaine therapy (n=1503), 20% received this agent. Use of study drugs was lower among eligible elderly patients, especially those older than 74 years (thrombolytic agent: odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.4; aspirin: odds ratio, 0.4, 95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.6;β-blocker: odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.8). Female gender was associated with lower levels of aspirin use among eligible patients (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 0.9); and there was a trend toward lower levels of β-blocker and thrombolytic use among eligible women.

Conclusions: Use of lifesaving therapies for eligible patients with AMI is higher than previously reported, particularly for aspirin and thrombolytic use in nonelderly patients. Lidocaine is still used inappropriately in a substantial proportion of patients with AMI. Increased adherence to AMI treatment guidelines is required for elderly patients and women.(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:799-805)

Introduction Prior studies identifying patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) utilizing administrative codes have yielded inconsistent results. Our objective was to develop a robust electronic medical record (EMR) based model for classification of IBD leveraging the combination of codified data and information from clinical text notes using natural language processing (NLP).

Methods Using the EMR of 2 large academic centers, we created data marts for Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) comprising patients with ≥ 1 ICD-9 code for each disease. We utilized codified (i.e. ICD9 codes, electronic prescriptions) and narrative data from clinical notes to develop our classification model. Model development and validation was performed in a training set of 600 randomly selected patients for each disease with medical record review as the gold standard. Logistic regression with the adaptive LASSO penalty was used to select informative variables.

Results We confirmed 399 (67%) CD cases in the CD training set and 378 (63%) UC cases in the UC training set. For both, a combined model including narrative and codified data had better accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) for CD 0.95; UC 0.94) than models utilizing only disease ICD-9 codes (AUC 0.89 for CD; 0.86 for UC). Addition of NLP narrative terms to our final model resulted in classification of 6–12% more subjects with the same accuracy.

Conclusion Inclusion of narrative concepts identified using NLP improves the accuracy of EMR case-definition for CD and UC while simultaneously identifying more subjects compared to models using codified data alone.

Introduction Vitamin D may have an immunological role in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Retrospective studies suggested a weak association between vitamin D status and disease activity but have significant limitations.

Methods Using a multi-institution inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort, we identified all CD and UC patients who had at least one measured plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D]. Plasma 25(OH)D was considered sufficient at levels ≥ 30ng/mL. Logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders were used to identify impact of measured plasma 25(OH)D on subsequent risk of IBD-related surgery or hospitalization. In a subset of patients where multiple measures of 25(OH)D were available, we examined impact of normalization of vitamin D status on study outcomes.

Results Our study included 3,217 patients (55% CD, mean age 49 yrs). The median lowest plasma 25(OH)D was 26ng/ml (IQR 17–35ng/ml). In CD, on multivariable analysis, plasma 25(OH)D < 20ng/ml was associated with an increased risk of surgery (OR 1.76 (1.24 – 2.51) and IBD-related hospitalization (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.59 – 2.68) compared to those with 25(OH)D ≥ 30ng/ml. Similar estimates were also seen for UC. Furthermore, CD patients who had initial levels < 30ng/ml but subsequently normalized their 25(OH)D had a reduced likelihood of surgery (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 – 0.98) compared to those who remained deficient.

Conclusion Low plasma 25(OH)D is associated with increased risk of surgery and hospitalizations in both CD and UC and normalization of 25(OH)D status is associated with a reduction in the risk of CD-related surgery.