Person: Mekary, Rania
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
First Name
Name
Search Results
Publication Visual outcomes after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
(Springer US, 2017) Muskens, Ivo S.; Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H.; Briceno, Vanessa; Lamba, Nayan; Senders, Joeky; van Furth, Wouter R.; Verstegen, Marco J. T.; Smith, Timothy; Mekary, Rania; Eenhorst, Christine A. E.; Broekman, Marike L. D.Purpose Patients with pituitary adenomas often present with visual deficits. While the aim of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is to improve these deficits, permanent worsening is a possible outcome. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of EETS for pituitary adenomas on visual outcomes. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled prevalence was calculated for complete recovery, improvement, and deterioration of visual field deficits, visual acuity and unspecified visual function in fixed- and random-effect models, including assessment of heterogeneity (I2) and publication bias (Begg’s test). Results: Out of 2636 articles, 35 case series were included in the meta-analysis. Results are described for fixed-effect models. For patients with impaired visual acuity, only one study reported complete recovery (27.2%). Pooled prevalence for improvement was 67.5% (95% CI = 59.1–75.0%), but with considerable heterogeneity (I2: 86.0%), and 4.50% (95% CI = 1.80–10.8%) for patients experiencing deterioration. For patients with visual field deficits, the prevalence was 40.4% (95% CI = 34.8–46.3%) for complete recovery, 80.8% (95% CI = 77.7–83.6%) for improvement, and 2.3% (95% CI = 1.1–4.7%) for deterioration. For the unspecified visual outcomes, pooled prevalence of complete recovery was 32.9% (95% CI: 28.5–37.7%), but with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 84.2%). The prevalence was 80.9% (95% CI = 77.9–83.6) for improvement and 2.00% (95% CI = 1.10–3.40%) for deterioration. Random-effect models yielded similar results. Publication bias was non-significant for all the outcomes. Conclusion: While visual deficits improved after EETS in the majority of patients, complete recovery was only achieved in less than half of the patients and some patients even suffered from visual deterioration. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11102-017-0815-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Publication The endoscopic endonasal approach is not superior to the microscopic transcranial approach for anterior skull base meningiomas—a meta-analysis
(Springer Vienna, 2017) Muskens, Ivo S.; Briceno, Vanessa; Ouwehand, Tom L.; Castlen, Joseph P.; Gormley, William; Aglio, Linda; Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H.; van Furth, Wouter R.; Smith, Timothy; Mekary, Rania; Broekman, Marike L. D.Object In the past decade, the endonasal transsphenoidal approach (eTSA) has become an alternative to the microsurgical transcranial approach (mTCA) for tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) and olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate which approach offered the best surgical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from 2004 and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled incidence was calculated for gross total resection (GTR), visual improvement, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, intraoperative arterial injury, and mortality, comparing eTSA and mTCA, with p-interaction values. Results: Of 1684 studies, 64 case series were included in the meta-analysis. Using the fixed-effects model, the GTR rate was significantly higher among mTCA patients for OGM (eTSA: 70.9% vs. mTCA: 88.5%, p-interaction < 0.01), but not significantly higher for TSM (eTSA: 83.0% vs. mTCA: 85.8%, p-interaction = 0.34). Despite considerable heterogeneity, visual improvement was higher for eTSA than mTCA for TSM (p-interaction < 0.01), but not for OGM (p-interaction = 0.33). CSF leak was significantly higher among eTSA patients for both OGM (eTSA: 25.1% vs. mTCA: 10.5%, p-interaction < 0.01) and TSM (eTSA: 19.3%, vs. mTCA: 5.81%, p-interaction < 0.01). Intraoperative arterial injury was higher among eTSA (4.89%) than mTCA patients (1.86%) for TSM (p-interaction = 0.03), but not for OGM resection (p-interaction = 0.10). Mortality was not significantly different between eTSA and mTCA patients for both TSM (p-interaction = 0.14) and OGM resection (p-interaction = 0.88). Random-effect models yielded similar results. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, eTSA was not shown to be superior to mTCA for resection of both OGMs and TSMs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-017-3390-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.