Person: Yeap, Beow
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
First Name
Name
Search Results
Publication Clinical, Pathologic, and Biologic Features Associated with BRAF Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
(American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2013) Cardarella, S.; Ogino, Atsuko; Nishino, Michiya; Butaney, M.; Shen, Jeanne; Lydon, C.; Yeap, Beow; Sholl, Lynette; Johnson, Bruce; Janne, PasiPurpose
BRAF mutations are found in a subset of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with NSCLC harboring BRAF mutations.
Experimental Design
Using DNA sequencing, we successfully screened 883 NSCLC patients for BRAF mutations between 7/1/09 and 7/16/12. Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between patients with and without BRAF mutations. Wild type controls consisted of NSCLC patients without a somatic alteration in BRAF, KRAS, EGFR, and ALK. In vitro studies assessed the biological properties of selected non-V600E BRAF mutations identified from NSCLC patients.
Results
Of 883 tumors screened, 36 (4%) harbored BRAF mutations (V600E: 18; non-V600E: 18) and 257 were wild type for BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, and ALK negative. Twenty-nine of the 36 BRAF mutant patients were smokers. There were no distinguishing clinical features between BRAF mutant and wild type patients. Advanced NSCLC patients with BRAF mutations and wild type tumors showed similar response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival. Within the BRAF cohort, patients with V600E mutated tumors had a shorter PFS to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to those with non-V600E mutations, although this did not reach statistical significance (4.1 versus 8.9 months; P=0.297). We identified five BRAF mutations not previously reported in NSCLC; two of the five were associated with increased BRAF kinase activity.
Conclusions
BRAF mutations occur in 4% of NSCLCs and half are non-V600E. Prospective trials are ongoing to validate BRAF as a therapeutic target in NSCLC.
Publication Lung Adenocarcinoma with EGFR Amplification Has Distinct Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features in Never-Smokers
(American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2009) Sholl, Lynette; Yeap, Beow; Iafrate, Anthony; Holmes-Tisch, A. J.; Chou, Y.-P.; Wu, Ming-Tsang; Goan, Y.-G.; Su, Li; Benedettini, E.; Yu, J.; Loda, Massimo; Janne, Pasi; Christiani, David; Chirieac, LucianIn a subset of lung adenocarcinomas the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is activated by kinase domain mutations and/or gene amplification, but the interaction between the two types of abnormalities is complex and unclear. We selected to study 99 consecutive never-smoking women of East Asian origin with lung adenocarcinomas that were characterized by histologic subtype. We analyzed EGFR mutations by PCR-capillary sequencing, EGFR copy number abnormalities by fluorescence and chromogenic in situ hybridization and quantitative PCR, and EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry with both specific antibodies against exon 19 deletion-mutated EGFR and total EGFR. We compared molecular and clinicopathologic features with disease-free survival. Lung adenocarcinomas with EGFR amplification had significantly more EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations than adenocarcinomas with disomy, low and high polysomy (100% v 54%, P=0.009). EGFR amplification occurred invariably on the mutated and not the wildtype allele (median mutated:wildtype ratios 14.0 v .33, P=0.003), was associated with solid histology (P=0.008), and advanced clinical stage (P=0.009). EGFR amplification was focally distributed in lung cancer specimens, mostly in regions with solid histology. Patients with EGFR amplification had a significantly worse outcome in univariate analysis (median disease-free survival 16 v 31 months, P=0.01) and when adjusted for stage (P=0.027). Lung adenocarcinomas with EGFR amplification have a unique association with exon 19 deletion mutations and demonstrate distinct clinicopathologic features associated with a significantly worsened prognosis. In these cases, EGFR amplification is heterogeneously distributed, mostly in areas with a solid histology.
Publication Sox2 Protein Expression is an Independent Poor Prognostic Indicator in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma
(Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2010) Sholl, Lynette; Barletta, Justine; Yeap, Beow; Chirieac, Lucian; Hornick, JasonMany patients with stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma will develop recurrence following surgical excision. Sox2 is a marker of embryonic stem cell pluripotency that is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and is expressed in a subset of lung adenocarcinomas. We hypothesized that Sox2 expression may provide prognostic information in early stage lung adenocarcinomas. We evaluated formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue from 104 stage I lung adenocarcinomas resected between 1997 and 2000. Sox2 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and compared to clinicopathologic features, time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Sox2 expression was detected in 50% of cases and was more frequent in tumors from older and male patients but not significantly associated with smoking status, tumor stage, grade, or histologic subtype. Compared to Sox2-negative tumors, Sox2 expression predicted a shorter TTP (49% versus 82% at 5 years; P = 0.0006) and shorter OS (54% versus 79% at 5 years; P = 0.004). By multivariate analysis, Sox2 expression predicted a greater risk of progression among men (hazard ratio [HR] 5.6; 95% CI 2.3 to 13.8) and women (HR 2.1; 95% CI 0.8 to 5.7). Sox2 expression was associated with significantly shorter OS among men (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 5.1), but not in women. Sox2 appears to be an independent predictor of poor outcome in stage I lung adenocarcinomas and may help stratify patients at increased risk for recurrence.
Publication EGFRMutation Is a Better Predictor of Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Than FISH, CISH, and Immunohistochemistry
(Oxford University Press (OUP), 2010) Sholl, Lynette; Xiao, Yun; Joshi, Victoria; Yeap, Beow; Cioffredi, Leigh-Anne; Jackman, David M; Lee, Charles; Janne, Pasi; Lindeman, NealAbout 10% of patients with non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) respond to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). More than 75% of “responders” have activating mutations in EGFR. However, mutation analysis is not widely available, and proposed alternatives (in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis) have shown inconsistent associations with outcome. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), immunohistochemical analysis, and DNA sequencing were compared in this study of 40 NSCLC samples from TKI-treated patients. Response rates were 12 of 19 in EGFR-mutant vs 1 of 20 EGFR wild-type tumors (P = .0001), 7 of 19 FISH+ vs 4 of 17 FISH– tumors (not significant [NS]), 5 of 16 CISH+ vs 6 of 21 CISH– tumors (NS), and 3 of 9 immunohistochemically positive vs 7 of 22 immunohistochemically negative tumors (NS). EGFR mutation was associated with improved progression-free survival (P = .0004). Increased copy number (FISH or CISH) and protein expression (immunohistochemical) did not independently predict outcome. Thus, EGFR sequence analysis was the only method useful for predicting response and progression-free survival following TKI therapy in NSCLC.