Person:

Rader, Kevin A.

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Rader

First Name

Kevin A.

Name

Rader, Kevin A.

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication

    Methods for Analyzing Survival and Binary Data in Complex Surveys

    (2014-06-06) Rader, Kevin A.; Harrington, David Paul; Lipsitz, Stuart Roger; Parzen, Michael

    Studies with stratified cluster designs, called complex surveys, have increased in popularity in medical research recently. With the passing of the Affordable Care Act, more information about effectiveness of treatment, cost of treatment, and patient satisfaction may be gleaned from these large complex surveys. We introduce three separate methodological approaches that are useful in complex surveys.

  • Publication

    Precision of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of acetabular cup stability and polyethylene wear improved by adding tantalum beads to the liner

    (Informa Healthcare, 2015) Nebergall, Audrey K; Rader, Kevin A.; Palm, Henrik; Malchau, Henrik; Greene, Meridith E

    Background and purpose In traditional radiostereometric analysis (RSA), 1 segment defines both the acetabular shell and the polyethylene liner. However, inserting beads into the polyethylene liner permits employment of the shell and liner as 2 separate segments, enabling distinct analysis of the precision of 3 measurement methods in determining femoral head penetration and shell migration. Patients and methods The UmRSA program was used to analyze the double examinations of 51 hips to determine if there was a difference in using the shell-only segment, the liner-only segment, or the shell + liner segment to measure wear and acetabular cup stability. The standard deviation multiplied by the critical value (from a t distribution) established the precision of each method. Results: Due to the imprecision of the automated edge detection, the shell-only method was least desirable. The shell + liner and liner-only methods had a precision of 0.115 mm and 0.086 mm, respectively, when measuring head penetration. For shell migration, the shell + liner had a precision of 0.108 mm, which was better than the precision of the shell-only method. In both the penetration and migration analyses, the shell + liner condition number was statistically significantly lower and the bead count was significantly higher than for the other methods. Interpretation Insertion of beads in the polyethylene improves the precision of femoral head penetration and shell migration measurements. A greater dispersion and number of beads when combining the liner with the shell generated more reliable results in both analyses, by engaging a larger portion of the radiograph.