Person:
McNamara, Brian

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

McNamara

First Name

Brian

Name

McNamara, Brian

Filters

20011

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.7fda631d-6929-4426-9cbe-71b428bd126b

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Chandra Study of an Overdensity of X-Ray Sources around Two Distant (z ~ 0.5) Clusters
    (IOP Publishing, 2001) Cappi, M.; Mazzotta, P.; Elvis, Martin; Burke, D. J.; Comastri, A.; Fiore, F.; Forman, William; Fruscione, Antonella; Green, P.; Harris, D.; Hooper, E. J.; Jones, C.; Kaastra, J. S.; Kellogg, E.; Murray, S.; McNamara, Brian; Nicastro, F.; Ponman, T. J.; Schlegel, E. M.; Siemiginowska, Aneta; Tananbaum, Harvey; Viklinin, Alexey; Virani, S.; Wilkes, Belinda
    We present results from a Chandra X-Ray Observatory study of the field X-ray source populations in four different observations: two high-redshift (z ~ 0.5) clusters of galaxies 3C 295 and RX J003033.2+261819; and two noncluster fields with similar exposure time. Surprisingly, the 0.5-2 keV source surface densities (~900-1200 sources deg-2 at a flux limit of 1.5 × 10-15 ergs cm-2 s-1) measured in an ~8' × 8' area surrounding each cluster exceed by a factor of ~2 the value expected on the basis of the ROSAT and Chandra log N- log S, with a significance of ~2 σ each, or ~3.5 σ when the two fields are combined (i.e., a probability to be a statistical fluctuation of <1% and <0.04%, respectively). The same analysis performed on the noncluster fields and on the outer chips of the cluster fields does not show evidence of such an excess. In both cluster fields, the summed 0.5-10 keV spectrum of the detected objects is well fitted by a power law with Γ ~ 1.7 similar to active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and shows no sign of intrinsic absorption. The few (~10 of 35) optical identifications available to date confirm that most of them are, as expected, AGNs, but the number of redshifts available is too small to allow conclusions on their nature. We discuss possible interpretations of the overdensity in terms of a statistical variation of cosmic background sources; a concentration of AGNs and/or powerful starburst galaxies associated with the clusters; and gravitational lensing of background QSOs by the galaxy clusters. All explanations, however, are difficult to reconcile with the large number of excess sources detected. Deeper X-ray observations and more redshifts measurements are clearly required to settle the issue.