Person:
Bido, Jennifer

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Bido

First Name

Jennifer

Name

Bido, Jennifer

Filters

2015 - 20182

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.82dd4e1e-74f5-48fb-b724-a7b636d7b739

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    Sustainability Assessment of a Short-Term International Medical Mission
    (Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2015) Bido, Jennifer; Singer, Sara; Diez Portela, D.; Ghazinouri, R.; Driscoll, Daniel; Alcantara Abreu, L.; Aggouras, B. M.; Thornhill, Thomas; Katz, Jeffrey
    Background: Few studies have analyzed the tangible impact of global, philanthropic medical missions. We used qualitative methods to analyze the work of one such mission, Operation Walk Boston, which has made yearly trips to a Dominican Republic hospital since 2008. Methods: We interviewed twenty-one American and Dominican participants of the Operation Walk Boston team to investigate how the program led to changes at the host Dominican hospital and how the experience caused both mission protocols and U.S. practices to change. Transcripts were analyzed with the use of content analysis. Results: Participants noted that Operation Walk Boston’s technical knowledge transfer and managerial examples led to sustainable changes at the Dominican hospital. Additionally, participants observed an evolution in nursing culture, as the program inspired greater independence in decision-making. Participants also identified barriers such as language and organizational hierarchy that may limit bidirectional knowledge transfer. U.S. participants noted that their practices at home changed as a result of better appreciation for different providers’ roles and for managing cost in a resource-constrained environment. Conclusions: Operation Walk Boston catalyzed sustainable changes in the Dominican hospital. Cultural norms and organizational structure are important determinants of program sustainability.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Surgical Missions
    (2018-05-15) Bido, Jennifer
    Background: Medical missions to low and middle-income countries are increasingly frequent, with an estimated 6,000 trips accounting for ~ 200,000 surgical cases and over $250 million in costs annually. However, these missions have received little critical evaluation, which has prompted questions about their sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and quality of care. In response to these critiques, a few proposed frameworks for the evaluation of missions have been published. While these publications offer theoretical frameworks that detail topics for evaluation, they do not agree on which aspects should be assessed and they have not been shown to quantify or change the practices of an established mission. This paper presents proposes an evaluation model for surgical missions based on the research program of Operation Walk (Op-Walk) Boston, a mission trip to the Dominican Republic that provides total joint arthroplasty. Methods: We began the construction of the evaluation model by using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) “Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health” to analyze Op-Walk Boston’s prior research efforts. This led to the creation of a logic model to better visualize Op-Walk Boston’s work stream for providing care. Additionally, the logic model delineated the different aspects of the mission that should be evaluated. In order to compare how our evaluation categories compared to other evaluation models, we conducted a literature search for review papers on medical missions as well as prior evaluation models. Using the information gathered from the CDC framework and the literature, we propose an evaluation model that calls for an assessment of the salient contextual factors (e.g. culture & beliefs), system management (structure, process and outcomes), and the sustainability of the program interventions. We then used these domains to present findings from the quantitative and qualitative research work of Op-Walk Boston. Results: Op-Walk Boston’s qualitative research findings demonstrated that cultural factors are important determinants of patients’ perceptions of arthritis etiology, physical activity patterns and treatment preferences. Quantitative assessments documented that the Dominican patients had worse lower extremity functional status (mean WOMAC function score of 33.6 compared to 43.3-54) and pain preoperatively than patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement in the US, yet they achieved excellent outcomes (fifty-point improvement), comparable to those of their US counterparts. Assessments of the quality and of sustainability of the program showed that the quality of care provided by Op-Walk Boston meets Blue Cross/Blue Shield Center of Excellence criteria and that sustainable changes were transferred to the host hospital. Finally, we assessed the effectiveness of Op-Walk Boston’s prior research work using the CDC’s recommended standards for effective evaluation implementation and determined that it met appropriate levels of utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. Conclusion: Our proposed model offers a method for the formal assessment of medical missions that addresses the call for evidence of their merit. The prior research efforts of Op-Walk Boston within each of our suggested evaluation domains have improved the work of the mission by detecting both the strengths and inadequacies of the program. We suggest that surgical missions adopt quantitative and qualitative strategies to document their impact, identify areas of improvement and justify program continuation, growth and support.