Person:

Grama, Abhinav

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Grama

First Name

Abhinav

Name

Grama, Abhinav

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication

    Motion Processing in the Larval Zebrafish Tectum

    (2015-05-14) Grama, Abhinav; Sanes, Joshua; Murthy, Venkatesh; Uchida, Nao

    Larval zebrafish are highly visual animals that display a diverse repertoire of visually guided behaviors. Five days after their birth, they start tracking and hunting moving prey, a behavior that likely requires underlying neural circuits to analyze motion. The optic tectum, the largest structure in the zebrafish brain, is known to be involved in prey capture behavior. The specific role of this structure in motion processing is still an open question. The larval tectum receives processed inputs from direction selective retinal ganglion cells (DSRGCs). How do these inputs influence the responses of tectal neurons? Do local tectal circuits further affect tectal responses to motion? To study this, we performed in vivo two-photon calcium imaging on populations of tectal neurons and in vivo whole cell recordings while presenting larvae with moving stimuli. We show that a substantial fraction of tectal neurons are sensitive to the direction and speed of moving stimuli. Direction selectivity (DS) in these neurons is weakly correlated with RGC inputs and strongly correlated with local inhibition. The inhibition comes from the null direction of the recorded neurons and appears to be mediated by direction selective inhibitory neurons. Our data demonstrates the presence of a tectal circuit for computing the direction of motion, whose motif resembles the DS circuit in the vertebrate retina.
    What roles do excitatory and inhibitory tectal neurons have in motion processing? To explore this, we recorded motion responses from labeled glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in conjunction with a newly generated pan-neuronal transgenic line expressing the genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP6s. We show that excitatory and inhibitory tectal neurons display a matching degree of selectivity to motion. DS inhibitory neurons seem to cluster into two populations preferring head-directed or tail-directed motion. In contrast, DS excitatory neurons form three overlapping clusters. The preferred directions of these clusters appear to be phase shifted with respect to those of DSRGC inputs. Our results show that rather than being a simple relay center for processed retinal inputs, the tectum builds direction selective responses by employing a network of highly selective interneurons. This processing appears to transform the representation of motion direction by RGCs into distinct representations by subpopulations of tectal neurons.

  • Publication

    Direction selectivity in the larval zebrafish tectum is mediated by asymmetric inhibition

    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2012) Grama, Abhinav; Engert, Florian

    The extraction of the direction of motion is an important computation performed by many sensory systems and in particular, the mechanism by which direction-selective retinal ganglion cells (DS-RGCs) in the retina acquire their selective properties, has been studied extensively. However, whether DS-RGCs simply relay this information to downstream areas or whether additional and potentially de novo processing occurs in these recipient structures is a matter of great interest. Neurons in the larval zebrafish tectum, the largest retino-recipent area in this animal, show direction-selective (DS) responses to moving visual stimuli but how these properties are acquired is still unknown. In order to study this, we first used two-photon calcium imaging to classify the population responses of tectal cells to bars moving at different speeds and in different directions. Subsequently, we performed in vivo whole cell electrophysiology on these DS tectal neurons and we found that their inhibitory inputs were strongly biased toward the null direction of motion, whereas the excitatory inputs showed little selectivity. In addition, we found that excitatory currents evoked by a stimulus moving in the preferred direction occurred before the inhibitory currents whereas a stimulus moving in the null direction evoked currents in the reverse temporal order. The membrane potential modulations resulting from these currents were enhanced by the spike generation mechanism to generate amplified direction selectivity in the spike output. Thus, our results implicate a local inhibitory circuit in generating direction selectivity in tectal neurons.