Person: Konstantinidis, Ioannis T
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
First Name
Name
Search Results
Publication Does the Mechanism of Lymph Node Invasion Affect Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?
(Springer Science + Business Media, 2010) Konstantinidis, Ioannis T; Deshpande, Vikram; Zheng, Hui; Wargo, Jennifer Ann; Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos; Thayer, Sarah P.; Androutsopoulos, Vasiliki; Lauwers, Gregory Y.; Warshaw, Andrew; Ferrone, CristinaBackground: Lymph node metastases are prognostically significant in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Little is known about the significance of direct lymph node invasion. Aim: The aim of this study is to find out whether direct lymph node invasion has the same prognostic significance as regional nodal metastases. Methods: Retrospective review of patients resected between 1/1/1993 and 7/31/2008. “Direct” was defined as tumor extension into adjacent nodes, and “regional” was defined as metastases to peripancreatic nodes. Results: Overall, 517 patients underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma, of whom 89 had one positive node (direct 26, regional 63), and 79 had two positive nodes (direct 6, regional 68, both 5). Overall, survival of node-negative patients was improved compared to patients with positive nodes (N0 30.8 months vs. N1 16.4 months; p < 0.001). There was no survival difference for patients with direct vs. regional lymph node invasion (p = 0.67). Patients with one positive node had a better overall survival compared to patients with ≥2 positive nodes (22.3 and 15 months, respectively; p < 0.001). The lymph node ratio (+LN/total LN) was prognostically significant after Cox regression (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Isolated direct invasion occurs in 20% of patients with one to two positive nodes. Node involvement by metastasis or by direct invasion are equally significant predictors of reduced survival. Both the number of positive nodes and the lymph node ratio are significant prognostic factors.
Publication Trends in Presentation and Survival for Gallbladder Cancer During a Period of More Than 4 Decades
(American Medical Association (AMA), 2009) Konstantinidis, Ioannis T; Deshpande, Vikram; Genevay, Muriel; Berger, David; Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos; Tanabe, Kenneth; Zheng, Hui; Lauwers, Gregory Y.; Ferrone, CristinaObjectives: To determine the prevalence of incidentally found cases of gallbladder cancer, the incidence of residual disease at reexploration, and the changes in the mode of presentation, treatment, and survival of patients with gallbladder cancer during a period of more than 4 decades. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: University-affiliated tertiary care center. Patients: Between January 1, 1962, and March 1, 2008, 402 patients with gallbladder cancer were identified and their clinicopathologic data were analyzed. Interventions: Surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Main Outcome Measures: Incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer, incidence of residual disease, and differences in presentation, treatment, and survival. Results: Surgical exploration was performed in 260 patients (64.7%), of whom 151 (58.1%) underwent resection. The median age of the patients was 72 years, and 72.3% were female. Between January 1, 1994, and March 1, 2008, 6881 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed, and there were 17 incidentally discovered cases of gallbladder cancer (0.25%). Residual disease on reexploration was identified in 0 of 2 patients with T1 tumor, 3 of 13 patients with T2 tumor, and 8 of 10 patients with T3 tumor (P = .01). Patients with stage IV disease (34 [13.1%] diagnosed from 1962-1979; 34 [13.1%] diagnosed from 1980-1997; and 22 [8.5%] diagnosed from 1998-2008) had a median survival of 4 months (range, 0-37 months). Concomitant liver resections increased in the third study period (11.1%, 10.1%, and 54.3%; P < .001), with an increase in negative margins (33.3%, 42.0%, and 63.0%; P = .01). Cox regression analysis identified T stage and surgical margin status as significant prognostic factors. Conclusions: Gallbladder cancer is incidentally found during 0.25% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. As T stage increases, the likelihood of residual disease on reexploration increases. Although many patients with gallbladder cancer present with incurable disease and have very poor survival, the overall prognosis is improving, likely because of more extensive operations.
Publication Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
(Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2013) Konstantinidis, Ioannis T; Warshaw, Andrew; Allen, Jill; Blaszkowsky, Lawrence; Castillo, Carlos; Deshpande, Vikram; Hong, Theodore; Kwak, Eunice Lee; Lauwers, Gregory Y.; Ryan, David; Wargo, Jennifer Ann; Lillemoe, Keith; Ferrone, CristinaObjective: Patients who undergo an R0 resection of their pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have an improved survival compared with patients who undergo an R1 resection. It is unclear whether an R1 resection confers a survival benefit over locally advanced (LA) unresectable tumors. Our aim was to compare the survival of patients undergoing an R1 resection with those having LA tumors and to explore the prognostic significance of a 1-mm surgical margin. Methods: Clinicopathologic data from a pancreatic cancer database between January 1993 and July 2008 were reviewed. Locally advanced tumors had no evidence of metastatic disease at exploration. Results: A total of 1705 patients were evaluated for PDAC in the Department of Surgery. Of the 1084 (64%) patients who were surgically explored, 530 (49%) were considered unresectable (286 locally unresectable, 244 with distant metastasis). One hundred fifty-seven (28%) of the resected PDACs had an R1 resection. Patients undergoing an R1 resection had a slightly longer survival compared with those who had locally advanced unresectable cancers (14 vs 11 months; P < 0.001). Patients with R0 resections had a favorable survival compared with those with R1 resections (23 vs 14 months; P < 0.001), but survival after resections with 1-mm margin or less (R0-close) were similar to R1 resections: both groups had a significantly shorter median survival than patients with a margin of greater than 1 mm (R0-wide) (16 vs 14 vs 35 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients undergoing an R1 resection still have an improved survival compared with patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. R0 resections have an improved survival compared with R1 resections, but this survival benefit is lost when the tumor is within 1 mm of the resection margin.
Publication Gallbladder Lesions Identified on Ultrasound. Lessons from the Last 10 Years
(Springer Nature, 2011) Konstantinidis, Ioannis T; Bajpai, Surabhi; Kambadakone, Avinash R.; Tanabe, Kenneth; Berger, David; Zheng, Hui; Sahani, Dushyant; Lauwers, Gregory Y.; Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos; Warshaw, Andrew; Ferrone, CristinaBackground: Possible mass lesions identified on ultrasound (US) of the gallbladder may prompt an aggressive surgical intervention due to the possibility of a malignant neoplasm. Aim: This study aims to utilize a large modern series of patients with gallbladder lesions identified on US to evaluate imaging characteristics consistent with malignancy. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of gallbladder ultrasound reports and clinicopathologic data of patients with a mass identified on US. Results: Approximately 59,271 abdominal ultrasounds and 9,117 cholecystectomies were performed between February 2000 and February 2010. We identified 213 patients with a questionable gallbladder neoplasm on ultrasonography who underwent surgical exploration. Median age was 52 years (range = 11–87 years) and 147 (69%) were females. Final pathology demonstrated no neoplasm in 130 patients (61%), while 32 patients (15%) had a wall adenomyoma, 36 (17%) had a polyp (five of which were malignant), 14 (7%) had an adenocarcinoma not arising from a polyp, and one patient had a cystic papillary neoplasm. The smaller the lesion, the more likely it was to be a pseudo-mass. For lesions measuring <5 mm on US, 83% had no lesion found on final pathology. Significant predictors of malignancy were age >52 years (p < 0.001), presence of gallstones on US (p = 0.004), size >9 mm (p < 0.001), evidence of invasion at the liver interface (p < 0.001), and wall thickening >5 mm (p < 0.001). Shape (sessile or penduculated), echogenicity (echogenic or isoechoic), or presence of flow on Doppler were not predictors of malignancy. An US size of ≤9 mm had a negative predictive value of 100% for malignancy. Conclusions: Despite improvements in imaging, most apparent lesions measuring <5 mm on US are not identified in the surgical specimen. US size >9 mm, age >52 years, US suggestion of invasion at the liver interface, and wall thickening >5 mm, especially in the presence of gallstones, should raise the suspicion of malignancy.