Person:

Elman, Igor

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Elman

First Name

Igor

Name

Elman, Igor

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication

    Effects of Cortisol and Cocaine on Plasma Prolactin and Growth Hormone Levels in Cocaine-Dependent Volunteers

    (Elsevier, 2005) Elman, Igor; Lukas, Scott

    In rodents, corticosterone (cortisol in humans) facilitates cocaine self-administration purportedly via enhancement of dopaminergic activity in the brain. This study sought to assess central dopaminergic effects of cortisol in humans and to compare them to those of cocaine. Twelve cocaine-dependent individuals received an intravenous bolus of cortisol (0.5 and 0.2 mg/kg; n=6 for each dose) and cocaine (0.2 mg/kg) in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled and counterbalanced fashion. Their plasma was assayed over the next 120 min for prolactin and growth hormone (GH), which are two neuroendocrine indices of dopaminergic function. Cortisol injections produced significant increases in GH, while cocaine resulted in significant decreases in prolactin. Placebo administration was associated with gradual declines in prolactin, but the levels at the 90- and 120-min time points were significantly lower after cocaine than after placebo infusion. These different neuroendocrine response profiles point to important differences between dopaminergic effects of cortisol and cocaine.

  • Publication

    Gender Differences in the Motivational Processing of Facial Beauty

    (Elsevier, 2008) Levy, Boaz; Ariely, Dan; Mazar, Nina; Chi, Won; Lukas, Scott; Elman, Igor

    Gender may be involved in the motivational processing of facial beauty. This study applied a behavioral probe, known to activate brain motivational regions, to healthy heterosexual subjects. Matched samples of men and women were administered two tasks: (a) key pressing to change the viewing time of average or beautiful female or male facial images, and (b) rating the attractiveness of these images. Men expended more effort (via the key-press task) to extend the viewing time of the beautiful female faces. Women displayed similarly increased effort for beautiful male and female images, but the magnitude of this effort was substantially lower than that of men for beautiful females. Heterosexual facial attractiveness ratings were comparable in both groups. These findings demonstrate heterosexual specificity of facial motivational targets for men, but not for women. Moreover, heightened drive for the pursuit of heterosexual beauty in the face of regular valuational assessments, displayed by men, suggests a gender-specific incentive sensitization phenomenon.