Person: Sands, Kenneth
Loading...
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Sands
First Name
Kenneth
Name
Sands, Kenneth
6 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Publication Enhanced Identification of Postoperative Infections among Inpatients(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004) Noskin, Gary A.; Cunningham, Susan M.; Plaskett, Theresa; Fraser, Victoria J.; Olsen, Margaret A.; Tokars, Jerome I.; Solomon, Steven; Perl, Trish M.; Cosgrove, Sara E.; Tilson, Richard S.; Greenbaum, Maurice; Herwaldt, Loreen A.; Diekema, Daniel J.; Climo, Michael; Yokoe, Deborah S.; Zuccotti, Gianna; Hooper, David; Sands, Kenneth; Tully, John Lawrence; Wong, Edward S.; Platt, RichardWe evaluated antimicrobial exposure, discharge diagnoses, or both to identify surgical site infections (SSI). This retrospective cohort study in 13 hospitals involved weighted, random samples of records from 8,739 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures, 7,399 cesarean deliveries, and 6,175 breast procedures. We compared routine surveillance to detection through inpatient antimicrobial exposure (>9 days for CABG, >2 days for cesareans, and >6 days for breast procedures), discharge diagnoses, or both. Together, all methods identified SSI after 7.4% of CABG, 5.0% of cesareans, and 2.0% of breast procedures. Antimicrobial exposure had the highest sensitivity, 88%–91%, compared with routine surveillance, 38%–64%. Diagnosis codes improved sensitivity of detection of antimicrobial exposure after cesareans. Record review confirmed SSI after 31% to 38% of procedures that met antimicrobial surveillance criteria. Sufficient antimicrobial exposure days, together with diagnosis codes for cesareans, identified more postoperative SSI than routine surveillance methods. This screening method was efficient, readily standardized, and suitable for most hospitals.Publication Enhanced Identification of Postoperative Infections among Outpatients(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004) Miner, Andrew L.; Sands, Kenneth; Yokoe, Deborah S.; Freedman, John; Thompson, Kristin; Livingston, James Michael; Platt, RichardWe investigated using administrative claims data to identify surgical site infections (SSI) after breast surgery and cesarean section. Postoperative diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and pharmacy information were automatically scanned and used to identify claims suggestive of SSI (“indicators”) among 426 (22%) of 1,943 breast procedures and 474 (10%) of 4,859 cesarean sections. For 104 breast procedures with indicators explained in available medical records, SSI were confirmed for 37%, and some infection criteria were present for another 27%. Among 204 cesarean sections, SSI were confirmed for 40%, and some criteria were met for 27%. The extrapolated infection rates of 2.8% for breast procedures and 3.1% for cesarean section were similar to those reported by the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance program but differ in representing predominantly outpatient infections. Claims data may complement other data sources for identification of surgical site infections following breast surgery and caesarian section.Publication Using Automated Health Plan Data to Assess Infection Risk from Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002) Thompson, Kristin; Dokholyan, Rachel S.; Horan, Teresa C.; Gaynes, Robert P.; Solomon, Steven L.; Platt, Richard; Kleinman, Kenneth Paul; Livingston, James Michael; Bergman, Andrew; Mason, John H.; Sands, KennethWe determined if infection indicators were sufficiently consistent across health plans to allow comparison of hospitals’ risks of infection after coronary artery bypass surgery. Three managed care organizations accounted for 90% of managed care in eastern Massachusetts, from October 1996 through March 1999. We searched automated inpatient and outpatient claims and outpatient pharmacy dispensing files for indicator codes suggestive of postoperative surgical site infection. We reviewed full text medical records of patients with indicator codes to confirm infection status. We compared the hospital-specific proportions of cases with an indicator code, adjusting for health plan, age, sex, and chronic disease score. A total of 536 (27%) of 1,953 patients had infection indicators. Infection was confirmed in 79 (53%) of 149 reviewed records with adequate documentation. The proportion of patients with an indicator of infection varied significantly (p<0.001) between hospitals (19% to 36%) and health plans (22% to 33%). The difference between hospitals persisted after adjustment for health plan and patients’ age and sex. Similar relationships were observed when postoperative antibiotic information was ignored. Automated claims and pharmacy data from different health plans can be used together to allow inexpensive, routine monitoring of indicators of postoperative infection, with the goal of identifying institutions that can be further evaluated to determine if risks for infection can be reduced.Publication The Yield of Head CT in Syncope: A Pilot Study(Springer-Verlag, 2007) Bar, J. L.; Mottley, L.; Grossman, Shamai; Fischer, Christopher; Lipsitz, Lewis; Sands, Kenneth; Thompson, Sylvia V; Shapiro, Nathan; Zimetbaum, Peter; Thompson, Sally WrightAlthough head CT is often routinely performed in emergency department (ED) patients with syncope, few studies have assessed its value. Objectives: To determine the yield of routine head CT in ED patients with syncope and analyse the factors associated with a positive CT. Methods: Prospective, observational, cohort study of consecutive patients presenting with syncope to an urban tertiary-care ED (48 000 annual visits). Inclusion criteria: age >8 and loss of consciousness (LOC). Exclusion criteria included persistent altered mental status, drug-related or post-trauma LOC, seizure or hypoglycaemia. Primary outcome was abnormal head CT including subarachnoid, subdural or parenchymal haemorrhage, infarction, signs of acute stroke and newly diagnosed brain mass. Results: Of 293 eligible patients, 113 (39%) underwent head CT and comprise the study cohort. Ninety-five patients (84%) were admitted to the hospital. Five patients, 5% (95% CI=0.8%–8%), had an abnormal head CT: 2 subarachnoid haemorrhage, 2 cerebral haemorrhage and 1 stroke. Post hoc examination of patients with an abnormal head CT revealed focal neurologic findings in 2 and a new headache in 1. The remaining 2 patients had no new neurologic findings but physical findings of trauma (head lacerations with periorbital ecchymoses suggestive of orbital fractures). All patients with positive findings on CT were >65 years of age. Of the 108 remaining patients who had head CT, 45 (32%–51%) had signs or symptoms of neurologic disease including headache, trauma above the clavicles or took coumadin. Limiting head CT to this population would potentially reduce scans by 56% (47%–65%). If age >60 were an additional criteria, scans would be reduced by 24% (16%–32%). Of the patients who did not have head CT, none were found to have new neurologic disease during hospitalisation or 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the derivation of a prospectively derived decision rule has the potential to decrease the routine use of head CT in patients presenting to the ED with syncope.Publication Severe Sepsis: Variation in Resource and Therapeutic Modality use Among Academic Centers(BioMed Central, 2003) Black, Edgar; Graman, Paul S; Lanken, Paul N; Kahn, Katherine L; Snydman, David R; Parsonnet, Jeffrey; Moore, Richard; Yu, Donghui Tony; Sands, Kenneth; Schwartz, J. Sanford; Hibberd, Patricia Lavonne; Platt, Richard; Bates, DavidBackground: Treatment of severe sepsis is expensive, often encompassing a number of discretionary modalities. The objective of the present study was to assess intercenter variation in resource and therapeutic modality use in patients with severe sepsis. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1028 adult admissions with severe sepsis from a stratified random sample of patients admitted to eight academic tertiary care centers. The main outcome measures were length of stay (LOS; total LOS and LOS after onset of severe sepsis) and total hospital charges. Results: The adjusted mean total hospital charges varied from $69 429 to US$237 898 across centers, whereas the adjusted LOS after onset varied from 15.9 days to 24.2 days per admission. Treatments used frequently after the first onset of sepsis among patients with severe sepsis were pulmonary artery catheters (19.4%), ventilator support (21.8%), pressor support (45.8%) and albumin infusion (14.4%). Pulmonary artery catheter use, ventilator support and albumin infusion had moderate variation profiles, varying 3.2-fold to 4.9-fold, whereas the rate of pressor support varied only 1.92-fold across centers. Even after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, discharge diagnosis-relative group weight, organ dysfunction and service at onset, the odds for using these therapeutic modalities still varied significantly across centers. Failure to start antibiotics within 24 hours was strongly correlated with a higher probability of 28-day mortality (r2 = 0.72). Conclusion: These data demonstrate moderate but significant variation in resource use and use of technologies in treatment of severe sepsis among academic centers. Delay in antibiotic therapy was associated with worse outcome at the center level.Publication Automated Methods for Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections(Centers for Disease Control, 2001) Platt, Richard; Yokoe, Deborah S.; Sands, KennethAutomated data, especially from pharmacy and administrative claims, are available for much of the U.S. population and might substantially improve both inpatient and postdischarge surveillance for surgical site infections complicating selected procedures, while reducing the resources required. Potential improvements include better sensitivity, less susceptibility to interobserver variation, more uniform availability of data, more precise estimates of infection rates, and better adjustment for patients' coexisting illness.