Person:
Tian, Ju

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Tian

First Name

Ju

Name

Tian, Ju

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Dopamine neurons share common response function for reward prediction error
    (Springer Nature, 2016) Eshel, Neir; Tian, Ju; Bukwich, Michael; Uchida, Naoshige
    Dopamine neurons are thought to signal reward prediction error, or the difference between actual and predicted reward. How dopamine neurons jointly encode this information, however, remains unclear. One possibility is that different neurons specialize in different aspects of prediction error; another is that each neuron calculates prediction error in the same way. We recorded from optogenetically-identified dopamine neurons in the lateral ventral tegmental area (VTA) while mice performed classical conditioning tasks. Our tasks allowed us to determine the full input-output functions of dopamine neurons and compare them to each other. We found striking homogeneity among individual dopamine neurons: their responses to both unexpected and expected rewards followed the same function, just scaled up or down. As a result, we could describe both individual and population responses using just two parameters. Such uniformity ensures robust information coding, allowing each dopamine neuron to contribute fully to the prediction error signal.
  • Publication
    Neural Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Dopamine Reward Prediction Errors
    (2016-05-11) Tian, Ju; Assad, John; Dayan, Peter; Fusi, Stefano
    Dopamine neurons are thought to facilitate learning by signaling reward prediction errors (RPEs), the discrepancy between actual and expected reward. However, how RPEs are calculated remains unknown. In Chapter 1, I tested the hypothesis that RPE signals in dopamine neurons are inherited entirely from the lateral habenula, by examining how lesions of the habenular complex affect the response of optogenetically-identified dopamine neurons in mice. I found that despite large lesions of habenula, dopamine neurons maintained features of RPE coding pertaining to phasic dopamine responses. Interesting, a specific aspect of RPE signaling— the inhibitory responses caused by reward omission—was greatly diminished in habenula lesion animals. These results suggested that the RPE signals in dopamine neurons were not simply relayed from habenula and that multiple mechanisms underlie RPE signaling. In Chapter 2, I systematically examined how RPE is computed at a neural circuit level, by combining rabies virus-based monosynaptic retrograde tracing with optogenetic cell identification during electrophysiological recording. We characterized the firing patterns of 205 neurons presynaptic to dopamine neurons (“input neurons”) from 7 major VTA input areas in behaving mice. We found that relatively few input neurons signaled purely ‘actual’ reward or ‘expected’ reward. Instead, many input neurons across brain areas signaled combinations of these types of information. We also found that some input neurons signaled already-computed RPEs. These results demonstrate that the information required for dopamine neurons to compute RPE is not localized to specific brain areas; rather, the computation is distributed across multiple nodes in a brain-wide network. Together, these results provide new insights on the neural circuits involved in the computation of RPE signals in dopamine neurons.