Person:

Murphy, Shawn

For certain research questions related to long-term outcomes or to rare disorders, designing prospective studies is impractical or prohibitively expensive. Such studies could instead utilize clinical and magnetic resonance imaging data (MRI) collected as part of routine clinical care, stored in the electronic medical record (EMR). Using major depressive disorder (MDD) as a disease model, we examined the feasibility of studying brain morphology and associations with remission using clinical and MRI data exclusively drawn from the EMR. Advanced automated tools were used to select MDD patients and controls from the EMR who had brain MRI data, but no diagnosed brain pathology. MDD patients were further assessed for remission status by review of clinical charts. Twenty MDD patients (eight full-remitters, six partial-remitters, and six nonremitters), and fifteen healthy control subjects met all study criteria for advanced morphometric analyses. Compared to controls, MDD patients had significantly smaller right rostral-anterior cingulate volume, and level of non-remission was associated with smaller left hippocampus and left rostral-middle frontal gyrus volume. The use of EMR data for psychiatric research may provide a timely and cost-effective approach with the potential to generate large study samples reflective of the real population with the illness studied.

Introduction Prior studies identifying patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) utilizing administrative codes have yielded inconsistent results. Our objective was to develop a robust electronic medical record (EMR) based model for classification of IBD leveraging the combination of codified data and information from clinical text notes using natural language processing (NLP).

Methods Using the EMR of 2 large academic centers, we created data marts for Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) comprising patients with ≥ 1 ICD-9 code for each disease. We utilized codified (i.e. ICD9 codes, electronic prescriptions) and narrative data from clinical notes to develop our classification model. Model development and validation was performed in a training set of 600 randomly selected patients for each disease with medical record review as the gold standard. Logistic regression with the adaptive LASSO penalty was used to select informative variables.

Results We confirmed 399 (67%) CD cases in the CD training set and 378 (63%) UC cases in the UC training set. For both, a combined model including narrative and codified data had better accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) for CD 0.95; UC 0.94) than models utilizing only disease ICD-9 codes (AUC 0.89 for CD; 0.86 for UC). Addition of NLP narrative terms to our final model resulted in classification of 6–12% more subjects with the same accuracy.

Conclusion Inclusion of narrative concepts identified using NLP improves the accuracy of EMR case-definition for CD and UC while simultaneously identifying more subjects compared to models using codified data alone.