Person:

Moss, Alan

Background

The aim of this study was to describe the impacts of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from the patients’ perspective, and to inform the development of a conceptual model.

Methods

Focus groups and one-on-one interviews were undertaken in adult patients with IBD. Transcripts from the focus groups and interviews were analyzed to identify themes and links between themes, assisted by qualitative data software MaxQDA. Themes from the qualitative research were supplemented with those reported in the literature and concepts included in IBD-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

Results

Twenty-seven patients participated. Key physical symptoms included pain, bowel-related symptoms such as frequency, urgency, incontinence, diarrhea, passing blood, and systemic symptoms such as weight loss and fatigue. Participants described continuing and variable symptom experiences. IBD symptoms caused immediate disruption of activities but also had ongoing impacts on daily activities, including dietary restrictions, lifestyle changes, and maintaining close proximity to a toilet. More distal impacts included interference with work, school, parenting, social and leisure activities, relationships, and psychological well-being. The inconvenience of rectal medications, refrigerated biologics, and medication refills emerged as novel burdens not identified in existing PRO measures.

Conclusions

IBD symptoms cause immediate disruption in activities, but patients may continue to experience some symptoms on a chronic basis. The conceptual model presented here may be useful for identifying target concepts for measurement in future studies in IBD.

Goals and Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) serology testing is often used in patients with indeterminate colitis (IC) to help distinguish between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). We investigated the performance of serology testing in predicting future diagnosis in this setting.

Study

Observational study of individuals with IC at a single center who underwent IBD serology testing (pANCA, ASCA and anti-OmpC) and had at least 12 months follow-up from time of serology result.

Results

117 individuals with IC and 1 year follow-up data were enrolled. All IC patients had endoscopic and histologic evidence of colitis at enrollment. One year after serology testing, 58 (50%) individuals with IC were diagnosed with UC, 49 (42%) with CD, and 10 (9%) remained labeled with IC. The sensitivity/specificity of an initial positive pANCA for a subsequent diagnosis of UC was 78%/44%. For ASCA and anti-OmpC, the results were 18%/84% and 27%/75%, respectively, for a subsequent diagnosis of CD. A positive pANCA test was associated with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1–1.8) for a subsequent diagnosis of UC at 1 year. Neither positive ASCA (LR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.5–2.5) nor anti-OmpC (LR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6–2.0) was associated with a subsequent diagnosis CD in patients with IC.

Conclusions

The disease phenotype in the majority of individuals initially labeled with IC evolved to be more consistent with either UC or CD on follow-up. pANCA, ASCA, and anti-OmpC, individually, were of limited utility in predicting a patient’s subsequent disease phenotype.