Person: McAllister, Sandra
Loading...
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
McAllister
First Name
Sandra
Name
McAllister, Sandra
6 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Publication Subclonal Cooperation Drives Metastasis by Modulating Local and Systemic Immune Microenvironments(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019-07) Cristea, Simona; Kwak, Minsuk; Qin, Yuanbo; Laszewski, Tyler; Luoma, Adrienne; Marusyk, Andriy; Wagle, Nikhil; Fang, Rongxin; Polyak, Kornelia; Janiszewska, Michalina; Tabassum, Doris; Castaño, Zafira; Yamamoto, Kimiyo; Kingston, Natalie; Murphy, Katherine; Shu, Shaokun; Harper, Nicholas; Gil del Alcazar, Carlos; Alečković, Maša; Ekram, Muhammad; Cohen, Ofir; Wucherpfennig, Kai; Michor, Franziska; McAllister, SandraMost human tumours are heterogeneous, composed of cellular clones with different properties present at variable frequencies. Highly heterogeneous tumours have poor clinical outcomes, yet the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we show that minor subclones of breast cancer cells expressing IL11 and FIGF (VEGFD) cooperate to promote metastatic progression and generate polyclonal metastases composed of driver and neutral subclones. Expression profiling of the epithelial and stromal compartments of monoclonal and polyclonal primary and metastatic lesions revealed that this cooperation is indirect, mediated through the local and systemic microenvironments. We identified neutrophils as a leukocyte population stimulated by the IL11-expressing minor subclone and showed that the depletion of neutrophils prevents metastatic outgrowth. Single-cell RNA-seq of CD45+ cell populations from primary tumours, blood and lungs demonstrated that IL11 acts on bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, which induce pro-tumorigenic and pro-metastatic neutrophils. Our results indicate key roles for non-cell-autonomous drivers and minor subclones in metastasis.Publication Zoledronic acid alters hematopoiesis and generates breast tumor-suppressive bone marrow cells(BioMed Central, 2017) Ubellacker, Jessalyn; Haider, Marie-Therese; DeCristo, Molly; Allocca, Gloria; Brown, Nicola J.; Silver, Daniel P.; Holen, Ingunn; McAllister, SandraBackground: The bone-targeting agent zoledronic acid (ZOL) increases breast cancer survival in subsets of patients, but the underlying reasons for this protective effect are unknown. ZOL modulates the activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, which form hematopoietic stem cell niches, and therefore may affect hematopoietic cells that play a role in breast cancer progression. Method Immunocompetent and immunocompromised strains of mice commonly used for breast cancer research were injected with a single, clinically relevant dose of ZOL (100 μg/kg) or vehicle control. The effects of ZOL on the bone marrow microenvironment (bone volume, bone cell number/activity, extracellular matrix composition) were established at various time points following treatment, using micro-computed tomography (μCT) analysis, histomorphometry, ELISA and immunofluorescence. The effects on peripheral blood and bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor populations were assessed using a HEMAVET® hematology analyzer and multicolor flow cytometry, respectively. Tumor support function of bone marrow cells was determined using an in vivo functional assay developed in our laboratory. Results: Using multiple mouse strains, we observed transient changes in numbers of hematopoietic stem cells, myeloid-biased progenitor cells, and lymphoid-biased cells concurrent with changes to hematopoietic stem cell niches following ZOL administration. Importantly, bone marrow cells from mice treated with a single, clinically relevant dose of ZOL inhibited breast tumor outgrowth in vivo. The ZOL-induced tumor suppressive function of the bone marrow persisted beyond the time point at which numbers of hematopoietic progenitor cells had returned to baseline. Conclusions: These findings provide novel evidence that alterations to the bone marrow play a role in the anti-tumor activity of ZOL and suggest possibilities for capitalizing on the beneficial effects of ZOL in reducing breast cancer development and progression. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0815-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Publication Accounting for tumor heterogeneity when using CRISPR-Cas9 for cancer progression and drug sensitivity studies(Public Library of Science, 2018) Olive, Jessica; Qin, Yuanbo; DeCristo, Molly J.; Laszewski, Tyler; Greathouse, Frances; McAllister, SandraGene editing protocols often require the use of a subcloning step to isolate successfully edited cells, the behavior of which is then compared to the aggregate parental population and/or other non-edited subclones. Here we demonstrate that the inherent functional heterogeneity present in many cell lines can render these populations inappropriate controls, resulting in erroneous interpretations of experimental findings. We describe a novel CRISPR/Cas9 protocol that incorporates a single-cell cloning step prior to gene editing, allowing for the generation of appropriately matched, functionally equivalent control and edited cell lines. As a proof of concept, we generated matched control and osteopontin-knockout Her2+ and Estrogen receptor-negative murine mammary carcinoma cell lines and demonstrated that the osteopontin-knockout cell lines exhibit the expected biological phenotypes, including unaffected primary tumor growth kinetics and reduced metastatic outgrowth in female FVB mice. Using these matched cell lines, we discovered that osteopontin-knockout mammary tumors were more sensitive than control tumors to chemotherapy in vivo. Our results demonstrate that heterogeneity must be considered during experimental design when utilizing gene editing protocols and provide a solution to account for it.Publication CDK4/6 inhibition triggers anti-tumor immunity(2017) Goel, Shom; DeCristo, Molly J.; Watt, April C.; BrinJones, Haley; Sceneay, Jaclyn; Li, Ben B.; Khan, Naveed; Ubellacker, Jessalyn M.; Xie, Shaozhen; Metzger-Filho, Otto; Hoog, Jeremy; Ellis, Matthew J.; Ma, Cynthia; Ramm, Susanne; Krop, Ian E.; Winer, Eric P.; Roberts, Thomas M.; Kim, Hye-Jung; McAllister, Sandra; Zhao, JeanCyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are fundamental drivers of the cell cycle and are required for the initiation and progression of various malignancies1,2. Pharmacologic inhibitors of CDK4/6 have shown significant activity against several solid tumors3,4. Their primary mechanism of action is thought to be the inhibition of phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor, inducing G1 cell cycle arrest in tumor cells5. Here, we use murine models of breast carcinoma and other solid tumors to show that selective CDK4/6 inhibitors not only induce tumor cell cycle arrest, but also promote anti-tumor immunity. We confirm this phenomenon through transcriptomic analysis of serial biopsies from a clinical trial of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment for breast cancer. The enhanced anti-tumor immune response has two underpinnings. First, CDK4/6 inhibitors activate tumor cell expression of endogenous retroviral elements, thus increasing intracellular levels of double-stranded RNA. This in turn stimulates production of type III interferons and hence enhances tumor antigen presentation. Second, CDK4/6 inhibitors markedly suppress the proliferation of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Mechanistically, the effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors on both tumor cells and Tregs are associated with reduced activity of the E2F target, DNA methyltransferase 1. Ultimately, these events promote cytotoxic T cell-mediated clearance of tumor cells, which is further enhanced by the addition of immune checkpoint blockade. Our findings indicate that CDK4/6 inhibitors increase tumor immunogenicity and provide rationale for new combination regimens comprising CDK4/6 inhibitors and immunotherapies as anti-cancer treatment.Publication The unresolved role of systemic factors in bone metastasis(Elsevier, 2016) Ubellacker, Jessalyn; McAllister, SandraSystemic factors including cytokines, cell-free nucleic acids, microvesicles, and platelets are appreciated as important regulators of adenocarcinoma progression. Research findings using pre-clinical mouse models have revealed that many such systemically acting factors are either secreted by or responsive to peripheral tumors and impact bone and bone marrow (collectively referred to as the bone microenvironment) to initiate processes that ultimately govern disease progression, even in the absence of detectable bone metastases. In some cases, cancer-driven modulation of the bone microenvironment involves mobilization of bone marrow hematopoietic and mesenchymal cells into the circulation that are subsequently recruited into peripheral tissues and tumors. In other cases, systemic factors alter bone marrow cell (BMC) differentiation and/or gene expression to render the BMCs pro-tumorigenic even prior to their mobilization into the circulation. Given their effect on the bone microenvironment, it stands to reason that such systemic factors might also influence metastases in the bone; however, this hypothesis remains to be comprehensively tested. Here, we briefly review what is known, and not known, about systemic factors that regulate the bone microenvironment and thereby influence bone metastases. We also pose a number of currently unanswered questions in this active area of research. A better understanding of systemic processes that influence bone metastasis should aid discovery of therapeutic approaches that aim to eradicate or reduce disease burden in the bone, which is the cause of significant patient mortality and morbidity and is currently incurable.Publication The Bed and the Bugs: Interactions Between the Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer Stem Cells(Elsevier BV, 2012-10) Castaño, Zafira; Fillmore, Christine M.; Kim, Carla; McAllister, SandraTumors have been increasingly recognized as organs with a complexity that approaches, and may even exceed, that of healthy tissues. When viewed from this perspective, the biology of a tumor can be understood only by studying tumor cell heterogeneity and the microenvironment that is constructed during the course of tumorigenesis and malignant progression. Recent work has revealed the existence of cancer stem cells, the “bugs”, with the capacity for self-renewal and tumor propagation. In addition, it is now recognized that the tumor microenvironment, the “bed”, plays a critical role in supporting cancer stem cells and also may promote neoplasia and malignant progression. The interdependence of the cell-intrinsic features of cancer, including the cancer stem cell “bugs” and the tumor microenvironment “bed”, is only beginning to be understood. In this review, we highlight the rapidly evolving concepts about the interactions between tumor stem cells and their microenvironment, the insights gained from studying their normal tissue counterparts, and the questions and controversies surrounding this area of research, with an emphasis on breast and lung cancer. Finally, we address evidence supporting the notion that eliminating the bed as well as the bugs should lead to more effective and personalized cancer treatments that improve patient outcome.