Person: Matus, Kira
Loading...
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Matus
First Name
Kira
Name
Matus, Kira
4 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Publication Making Technological Innovation Work for Sustainable Development(2015) Diaz Anadon, Laura; Chan, Gabriel; Harley, Alicia; Matus, Kira; Murthy, Sharmila; Clark, WilliamSustainable development requires harnessing technological innovation to improve human well-being in current and future generations. However, poor, marginalized, and unborn populations too often lack the economic or political power to shape innovation processes to meet their needs. Issues arise at all stages of innovation, from invention of a technology through its selection, production, adaptation, adoption, and retirement. Three insights should inform efforts to intervene in innovation systems for sustainable development. First, innovation is not a linear process but rather a complex adaptive system involving many actors and institutions operating simultaneously from local to global levels; interventions must take this complexity into account. Second, there has been significant experimentation in mobilizing technology for sustainable development in the health, energy, and agriculture sectors, among others, but learning from past experience requires structured cross-sectoral comparisons and recognition of the socio-technical nature of innovation. Third, the current constellation of rules, norms, and incentives shaping innovation is not always aligned towards sustainable development. Past experience demonstrates that it is possible to reform these institutions, and the imperative of harnessing innovation for sustainable development makes it necessary to do so. Many actors have the power to re-orient innovation systems towards sustainable development through research, advocacy, training, convening, policymaking, and financing. We offer three proposals to begin: mobilizing global financing to invest in inventing suitable and affordable technologies to meet sustainable development objectives; developing measures to engage marginalized populations systematically through all stages of the innovation process; and establishing channels for regularized learning across domains of practice.Publication Innovation and Access to Technologies for Sustainable Development: A Global Systems Perspective(2014) Harley, Alicia; Murthy, Sharmila; Diaz Anadon, Laura; Chan, Gabriel Angelo; Matus, Kira; Moon, Suerie; Timmer, Vanessa Joanna; Clark, WilliamThis workshop report is a summary of themes discussed by five panels during a daylong workshop on “Innovation and Access to Technologies for Sustainable Development: A Global Perspective” at Harvard University on April 24,2014. The workshop brought together a diverse group of scholars to explore how the technological innovation needed for sustainable development can be promoted in ways that assure equitable access in current and future generations. Three key themes that emerged from the workshop include:(1) The central role of power, politics and agency in analyzing technological innovation and sustainable development -an important aspect of this includes the articulation of the roles of actors and organizations within frameworks and models of innovation systems.(2) The importance of focusing both on supply-push and demand-pull mechanisms in innovation scholarship and innovation policy.(3) The need to focus on more innovation scholarship around the goals of sustainable development.Publication Overcoming the Challenges to the Implementation of Green Chemistry(Center for International Development at Harvard University, 2007) Matus, Kira; Anastas, Paul T.; Clark, William; Itameri-Kinter, KaiThe Harvard-Yale-ACS GCI Green Chemistry Project is investigating the overall question of the circumstances under which firms can enact innovations that have both economic and environmental benefits, through a focused examination of the implementation of green chemistry. The research project has taken up three fundamental, interrelated questions: What factors act as barriers to the implementation of green chemistry? What actions can be taken by the government, academia, NGO’s and industry that will help alleviate these factors? What are the policy implications of these barriers and potential actions, for all of the involved stakeholders? During its initial phases, through interviews with a dozen green chemistry leaders from industry and academia, and through a multi-stakeholder workshop, the project has focused on the first two questions, and is working towards the third. Overall, we determined that there are six major classes of barriers to the implementation of green chemistry: economic, regulatory, technical, organizational, cultural and definition and metrics. From the workshop participants, six major action themes emerged to address these. They are: create incentives for the development and implementation of innovations; consider policies to shift focus to hazard reduction; facilitate linkages, networks and collaborations; act as a facilitator for multi-stakeholder initiatives; promote actions that make environmental and health impacts a larger part of the decision calculus; and support research, knowledge creation, and educational efforts to support green chemistry across a range of disciplines and problem areas.Publication Barriers to the Implementation of Green Chemistry in the United States(American Chemical Society, 2012) Matus, Kira; Clark, William; Anastas, Paul T.; Zimmerman, Julie B.This paper investigates the conditions under which firms are able to develop and implement innovations with sustainable development benefits. In particular, we examine “green chemistry” innovations in the United States. Via interviews with green chemistry leaders from industry, academia, nongovernmental institutions (NGOs), and government, we identified six major categories of challenges commonly confronted by innovators: (1) economic and financial, (2) regulatory, (3) technical, (4) organizational, (5) cultural, and (6) definition and metrics. Further analysis of these barriers shows that in the United States, two elements of these that are particular to the implementation of green chemistry innovations are the absence of clear definitions and metrics for use by researchers and decision makers, as well as the interdisciplinary demands of these innovations on researchers and management. Finally, we conclude with some of the strategies that have been successful thus far in overcoming these barriers, and the types of policies which could have positive impacts moving forward.