Person:
Festa, Natalia

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Festa

First Name

Natalia

Name

Festa, Natalia

Filters

20211

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.c612990f-ebff-4170-982a-e67c82a9bde4

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    Identifying Medicare beneficiaries with dementia
    (Wiley, 2021-04-26) Moura, Lidia M. V. R.; Festa, Natalia; Price, Mary; Volya, Margarita; Benson, Nicole M.; Zafar, Sahar; Weiss, Max; Blacker, Deborah; Normand, Sharon-Lise; Newhouse, Joseph; Hsu, John
    BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: No data exist regarding the validity of International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 dementia diagnoses within Medicare claims data. We examined the accuracy of claims-based diagnoses with respect to expert clinician adjudication using a novel database with individual-level linkages between electronic health record (EHR) and claims. DESIGN: In this retrospective observational study, two neurologists and two psychiatrists performed a standardized review of patients’ medical records from January-2016 to December-2018, and adjudicated dementia status. We measured the accuracy of three claims-based definitions of dementia against the reference standard. SETTING: Mass-General-Brigham Healthcare (MGB), Massachusetts, USA. PARTICIPANTS: From an eligible population of 40,690 fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65-years and older, within the MGB Accountable Care Organization (ACO), we generated a random sample of 1,002 patients, stratified by the pretest likelihood of dementia using administrative surrogates. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated the accuracy (area-under-receiver-operating-curve [AUROC]) and calibration (calibration-in-the-large [CITL] and calibration slope) of three ICD-10 claims-based definitions of dementia against clinician-adjudicated standards. We applied inverse probability weighting to reconstruct the eligible population and reported the mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for all performance characteristics, using 10-fold cross-validation (CV). RESULTS: Beneficiaries had an average age of 75.3-years and were predominately female (59%) and non-Hispanic white (93%). The adjudicated prevalence of dementia in the eligible population was 7%. The best performing definition demonstrated excellent accuracy (CV-AUC 0.94; 95% CI 0.92-0.96) and was well-calibrated to the reference standard of clinician-adjudicated dementia (CV-CITL <0.001, CV-slope 0.97). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to validate ICD-10 diagnostic codes against a robust and replicable approach to dementia ascertainment using a real-world clinical reference standard. The best performing definition includes diagnostic codes with strong face validity and outperforms an updated version of a previously validated ICD-9 definition of dementia.