Person: Muzin, Stefan
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
First Name
Name
Search Results
Publication Utilizing a handheld electrode array for localized muscle impedance measurements
(Wiley-Blackwell, 2012) Narayanaswami, Pushpa; Spieker, Andrew J.; Mongiovi, Phillip; Keel, John C.; Muzin, Stefan; Rutkove, SewardIntroduction: Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a non-invasive technique used for assessment of muscle health in which a high-frequency, low-amplitude electric current is applied to the skin overlying a muscle, and the resulting surface voltage is measured. We have previously used adhesive electrodes, application of which is inconvenient. We present data using a handheld electrode array (HEA) that we devised to expedite the EIM procedure in a clinical setting. Methods: Thirty-four healthy volunteers and 24 radiculopathy subjects underwent EIM testing using the HEA and adhesive electrodes. Results: The HEA was shown to have good test-retest reproducibility, with intraclass correlation coefficients as high as 0.99. HEA data correlated strongly with data from adhesive electrodes, ρ = 0.85 in healthy volunteers (p < 0.001) and ρ = 0.75 in radiculopathy subjects (p < 0.001). Discussion: These data support the potential use of a handheld array for performing rapid localized surface impedance measurements.
Publication Electrical impedance myography in the diagnosis of radiculopathy
(Wiley, 2013) Spieker, Andrew J.; Narayanaswami, Pushpa; Fleming, Laura; Keel, John C.; Muzin, Stefan; Rutkove, SewardWe sought to determine whether elec- trical impedance myography (EIM) could serve as a diagnostic procedure for evaluation of radiculopathy. Methods: Twenty- seven patients with clinically and radiologically diagnosed cervi- cal or lumbosacral radiculopathy who met a “gold standard” defi- nition underwent EIM and standard needle electromyography (EMG) of multiple upper or lower extremity muscles. Results: EIM reactance values revealed consistent reductions in the radic- ulopathy-affected myotomal muscles as compared with those on the unaffected side; the degree of asymmetry was associated strongly with the degree of EMG abnormality (P<0.001). EIM had a sensitivity of 64.5% and a specificity of 77.0%; in compari- son, EMG had a sensitivity of 79.7% but a specificity of 69.7%. Conclusions: These findings support the potential for EIM to serve as a new non-invasive tool to assist in diagnosis of radicu- lopathy; however, further refinement of the technique is needed for this specific application.