Person:

Love, Michael I.

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Love

First Name

Michael I.

Name

Love, Michael I.

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Publication

    MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens

    (BioMed Central, 2014) Li, Wei; Xu, Han; Xiao, Tengfei; Cong, Le; Love, Michael I.; Zhang, Feng; Irizarry, Rafael; Liu, Jun; Brown, Myles; Liu, X Shirley

    We propose the Model-based Analysis of Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout (MAGeCK) method for prioritizing single-guide RNAs, genes and pathways in genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. MAGeCK demonstrates better performance compared with existing methods, identifies both positively and negatively selected genes simultaneously, and reports robust results across different experimental conditions. Using public datasets, MAGeCK identified novel essential genes and pathways, including EGFR in vemurafenib-treated A375 cells harboring a BRAF mutation. MAGeCK also detected cell type-specific essential genes, including BCR and ABL1, in KBM7 cells bearing a BCR-ABL fusion, and IGF1R in HL-60 cells, which depends on the insulin signaling pathway for proliferation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0554-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

  • Publication

    A benchmark for RNA-seq quantification pipelines

    (BioMed Central, 2016) Teng, Mingxiang; Love, Michael I.; Davis, Carrie A.; Djebali, Sarah; Dobin, Alexander; Graveley, Brenton R.; Li, Sheng; Mason, Christopher E.; Olson, Sara; Pervouchine, Dmitri; Sloan, Cricket A.; Wei, Xintao; Zhan, Lijun; Irizarry, Rafael

    Obtaining RNA-seq measurements involves a complex data analytical process with a large number of competing algorithms as options. There is much debate about which of these methods provides the best approach. Unfortunately, it is currently difficult to evaluate their performance due in part to a lack of sensitive assessment metrics. We present a series of statistical summaries and plots to evaluate the performance in terms of specificity and sensitivity, available as a R/Bioconductor package (http://bioconductor.org/packages/rnaseqcomp). Using two independent datasets, we assessed seven competing pipelines. Performance was generally poor, with two methods clearly underperforming and RSEM slightly outperforming the rest. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

  • Publication

    Erratum to: A benchmark for RNA-seq quantification pipelines

    (BioMed Central, 2016) Teng, Mingxiang; Love, Michael I.; Davis, Carrie A.; Djebali, Sarah; Dobin, Alexander; Graveley, Brenton R.; Li, Sheng; Mason, Christopher E.; Olson, Sara; Pervouchine, Dmitri; Sloan, Cricket A.; Wei, Xintao; Zhan, Lijun; Irizarry, Rafael