Person:

Burdick, Elisabeth

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Burdick

First Name

Elisabeth

Name

Burdick, Elisabeth

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication

    Imminent adopters of electronic health records in ambulatory care

    (BCS Learning and Development Limited, 2009-03-01) Kaushal, Rainu; Bates, David; Jenter, Chelsea; Mills, Shannon; Volk, Lynn; Burdick, Elisabeth; Tripathi, Micky; Simon, Steven

    Background Although evidence suggests electronic health records (EHRs) can improve quality and efficiency, provider adoption rates in the US ambulatory setting are relatively low. Prior studies have identified factors correlated with EHR use, but less is known about characteristics of physicians on the verge of adoption. Objective To compare characteristics of physicians who are imminent adopters of EHRs with EHR users and non-users. Design and participants A survey was mailed (June – November 2005) to a stratified random sample of all medical practices in Massachusetts. One physician from each practice (n=1884) was randomly selected to participate. Overall, 1345 physicians (71.4%) responded to the survey, with 1082 eligible for analysis due to exclusion criteria. ‘Imminent adopters’ were those planning to adopt EHRs within 12 months. Measurements We assessed physician and practice characteristics, availability of technology, barriers to adoption or expansion of health information technology (HIT), computer proficiency, and financial considerations. Results Compared to non-users, imminent adopters were younger, more experienced with technology, and more often in practices engaged in quality improvement. More imminent adopters owned or partly owned their practices (57.4%) than users (33.5%; p<0.001), but fewer imminent adopters owned their practices than non-users (65.7%; p<0.001). Additionally, more imminent adopters (26.0%) reported personal financial incentives for HIT use than users (14.8%; p<0.001) and non-users (10.8%; p<0.001). Conclusions Imminent adopters of EHRs differed from users and non-users. Financial considerations appear to play a major role in adoption decisions. Knowledge of these differences may assist policy- makers and healthcare leaders as they work to increase EHR adoption rates.

  • Publication

    Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts

    (BCS Learning and Development Limited, 2008-07-01) Simon, Steven; Bates, David; Kaushal, Rainu; Jenter, Chelsea; Volk, Lynn; Burdick, Elisabeth; Poon, Eric; Tumolo, Alexis; Tripathi, Micky

    Objective The Massachusetts e-Health Collabora- tive (MAeHC) is implementing electronic health records (EHRs) in physicians’ offices throughout three diverse communities. This study’s objective was to assess the degree to which these practices are representative of physicians’ practices statewide. Design We surveyed all MAeHC physicians (n=464) and compared their responses to those of a contemporaneously surveyed statewide random sample (n=1884). Measurements The survey questionnaire assessed practice characteristics related to EHR adoption, prevailing office culture related to quality and safety, attitudes toward health information tech- nology (HIT) and perceptions of medical practice. Results A total of 355 MAeHC physicians (77%) and 1345 physicians from the statewide sample (71%) completed the survey. MAeHC practices resembled practices throughout Massachusetts in terms of practice size, physician age and gender, prevailing financial incentives for quality performance and HIT adoption and available resources for practice expansion. MAeHC practices were more likely to be located in rural areas (9.5% vs 4.4%, P=0.004). Physicians in both samples responded similarly to six of seven self-assessments of the office practice environment for quality and safety. Internet connec- tions were more prevalent among MAeHC practices than across the state (96% vs 83%, P<0.001), but similar proportions of MAeHC physicians (83%) and statewide physicians (86%) used the internet daily (P=0.19). Conclusion MAeHC is implementing EHRs and health information exchange among communities with physicians and practices that appear generally Keywords: health information technology, quality representative of Massachusetts. The lessons of care, regional health information organisations learned from this pilot project should be applicable statewide and to other states with large numbers of physicians in small office practices.