Person:
Weinberg, Nyasha

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Weinberg

First Name

Nyasha

Name

Weinberg, Nyasha

Filters

2023 - 20242

Settings

Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.fac5ab31-c0ab-4c14-a8f6-2d191b25eb8f

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    A Growth Policy to Close Britain's Regional Divides: What Needs to be Done
    (Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government, 2024-02) Weinberg, Nyasha; Turner, Daniel; Stansbury, Anna; Elsden, Esme; Balls, Edward
    Britain has huge geographic inequalities in economic outcomes, health, education and social mobility. While these have existed for centuries, they have widened in recent years. These divides, both between and within regions, not only waste talent and potential but also fuel a politically destabilising “geography of discontent”. The fact that UK’s national productivity growth has stagnated over the past eighteen years is a further impetus to action – tackling regional divides is vital to tackling this national malaise. We believe policy can and should do much more to respond to these deep and widening regional divides and raise UK-wide productivity growth. The UK has had regional policy for many years, and the prominence of ‘Levelling Up’, its latest incarnation, shows the political impetus to act on rising inequalities. But policy efforts are not working. Regional disparities have persisted and even worsened in recent years, despite the rhetoric. Tackling stagnant growth and low regional productivity is now a cross-party imperative. The Conservatives cannot hold together their 2019 electoral coalition without realising the promise of growth in the regions after leaving the European Union. Labour cannot achieve its growth mission of driving growth to the highest rates in the G7 without tackling regional underperformance. And the prize is significant: 78% of the UK’s GDP is generated outside London. If our non-London cities had the same skills profile as the national average, and saw the agglomeration benefits typical of West European cities of similar size, UK GDP could rise by £55bn, bringing in around £13bn of additional tax revenue every year. In this year of a General Election, we will see whether either or both parties can bring the leadership and mandate needed to reverse generational challenges facing the UK’s regions and nations. Our two previous papers in this series give us reason to believe that there are policies that could better support all regions of the UK to prosper: our first paper identified reforms that could help unlock the growth potential of all the UK’s regions; our second identified the political and administrative barriers that were preventing us from realising that opportunity.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    Why Hasn't UK Regional Policy Worked? The views of leading practitioners
    (Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government, 2023-10) Turner, Daniel; Weinberg, Nyasha; Elsden, Esme; Balls, Edward
    UK domestic policy – especially in England - in recent years has focused on regional inequalities in economic outcomes and public service delivery, which are tied to a political ‘geography of discontent’ that emerged in the 2010s. These inequalities are nothing new; nor are public policy efforts to address them. We conducted interviews with ninety-three top level political and official policymakers across the UK (spanning six decades of experience). This paper summarises practitioners’ views on the lessons we can learn from past efforts to address to address regional divides. We find broad political consensus on a range of areas: that widening divides are not inevitable; that previous policy regimes have lacked sufficient ambition; that excessive past centralisation has driven policy instability. We find that the Mayoral Combined Authority model, coupled with sustainable local government funding, could form the basis for a cross-party consensus on regional growth. Our interviewees diverge on how future reforms ought to be prioritised, with open questions on: the division of powers across tiers of government; how much institutional pluralism there ought to be in devolved governments; how to devolve power (and whether the current ‘bottom-up’ approach ought to remain); and on the design of fair funding formulae and fiscal devolution.