Person:

Freeman, Timothy

Wyoming’s longstanding strengths in resource extraction provide much of its livelihood, including its private earnings and public finances. However, its lack of activity in other sectors exposes Wyoming to economic shocks. This paper examines the state’s binding constraints to growth and identifies opportunities for diversification. The authors propose that Wyoming look to its advanced services and manufacturing sectors, which lag behind those in other states. The state has made critical investments in education to help generate the necessary pools of skilled labor, but the exodus of young people and families makes it exceedingly difficult.

Does economic prosperity in the Colombian Amazon require sacrificing the forest? This research compendium of a series of studies on the Colombian Amazon finds the answer to this question is no: the perceived trade-off between economic growth and forest protection is a false dichotomy. The drivers of deforestation and prosperity are distinct – as they happen in different places. Deforestation occurs at the agricultural frontier, in destroying some of the world’s most complex biodiversity by some of the least economically complex activities, particularly cattle-ranching. By contrast, the economic drivers in the Amazon are its urban areas often located far from the forest edge, including in non-forested piedmont regions. These cities offer greater economic complexity by accessing a wider range of productive capabilities in higher-income activities with little presence of those activities driving deforestation. Perhaps the most underappreciated facet of life in each of the three Amazonian regions studied, Caquetá, Guaviare, and Putumayo, is that the majority of people live in urban areas. This is a telling fact of economic geography: that even in the remote parts of the Amazon, people want to come together to live in densely populated areas. This corroborates the findings of our global research over the past two decades that prosperity results from expanding the productive capabilities available locally to diversify production to do more, and more complex, activities.

This report sets out to understand if the economy of the State of Wyoming is positioned to grow into the future. To do this, the report begins by investigating the past. To know where the state economy could be headed, and how that direction may be improved, it is critical to understand how the state developed the economic structure and drivers that it has today. Thus, Wyoming’s economic trajectory is explored over the long, medium, and short term. From this investigation, we find that Wyoming faces an overall growth problem, but we also find a high degree of variation in economic engines and growth prospects across the state. The problem that this report identifies is that the composition of economic activities is not positioned to sustain a high quality of life across all parts of the state.

“Across all parts of the state” is an essential part of the problem statement for Wyoming. While some local and regional economies in the state are growing and bumping up against identifiable constraints, other local and regional economies are experiencing sustained contractions and will require new sources of growth in order to retain (or expand) population and high quality of life. Since economic dynamics vary significantly across the state, analysis is conducted in as much geographic detail as possible. By combining historical and geographic dimensions of growth, this report aims to inform pathways for sustained and inclusive prosperity across the of Wyoming.

Wyoming communities are reliant on grants to fund local priorities, yet the grants system is not effectively meeting the needs of many communities across the state. This problem is central to the growth challenges of many rural economies across the state. Although this problem pre-dates the recent expansion of federal grant programs, the importance of this problem has grown in the last several years as the scale and complexity of federal grant opportunities — particularly discretionary grants — has increased. Wyoming communities are struggling to navigate and benefit from these federal funding opportunities. As of late 2023, the state is significantly underperforming many comparator states in the number of federal grants received and the distribution of federal grants across the state. Grant writers and administrators face a sometimes impossible task in navigating an ever-shifting grants landscape. This is a challenge for local governments across the country but may be especially important in Wyoming due to narrow local tax bases and the rural nature of the state.

Through an eight-month effort combining research and action, we have explored the causes of this problem to inform potential solutions. We have identified four principal constraints that are most to blame for Wyoming’s underperformance: (1) Lack of relationships between communities and funders; (2) Inability to follow changing grant opportunities (esp. federal); (3) Shortage of prioritized community needs and “grant ready” project plans; and (4) Overreliance on “local heroes” – especially for smaller communities. We argue that these challenges are “principal constraints” because they are binding for the largest number of communities, especially smaller communities. However, there are additional constraints that are critical for other communities, especially those that have more experience with accessing state and federal grants. This note summarizes key evidence we have found on each of these principal constraints. These constraints occur early in the grants process, meaning many potentially promising grant opportunities are never pursued. We find that many federal grant programs and discretionary award processes are inconsistent with the realities of scarce staff, resources, and bandwidth of local governments, especially in small communities. However, we find widespread examples and evidence that these constraints can be overcome through actions to enable a strong state-wide network that supports local leaders and grant administrators. Examples of success within the state and in other states show that building the capabilities of the network and enabling all communities to access the knowhow of the network can lead to much better grant outcomes.

The note closes with a discussion of how to target a network-enabling response to the grants problem. We outline a first-best option that centers on establishing regional officers who would be responsible for a set of tasks that would respond directly to the principal constraints identified. This approach would require annual funding, but preliminary analysis shows the return on investment overall would be very high and the approach would have the greatest benefits for smaller communities across the state. Very initial designs have been explored for how to establish such a system building on existing assets. Finally, we compare this first-best approach to alternative approaches that are closer to the current support actions underway in the state.