Person: Steiker, Carol
Loading...
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Steiker
First Name
Carol
Name
Steiker, Carol
13 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 13
Publication Of Cities, Rainforests, and Frogs: A Response to Allen and Rosenberg(1998) Steiker, CarolPublication The Limits of the Preventive State(1998) Steiker, CarolPublication Proposed Instruction(2001) Steiker, CarolPublication Promoting Criminal Justice Reform through Legal Scholarship: Toward a Taxonomy(2007) Steiker, CarolPublication The Seduction of Innocence: The Attraction and Limitations of the Focus on Innocence in Capital Punishment Law and Advocacy(2005) Steiker, Carol; STEIKER, JORDAN J.Publication Opening a Window or Building a Wall? The Effect of Eighth Amendment Death Penalty Law and Advocacy on Criminal Justice More Broadly(2008) STEIKER, JORDAN J.; Steiker, CarolPublication Symposium: Criminal Procedure in the Spotlight: The American Death Penalty and the (In)Visibility of Race(University of Chicago Press, 2015) Steiker, Carol; Steiker, Jordan M.Racial injustice has always cast a shadow over American criminal justice. In the context of capital punishment, racial disparities have been evident since colonial times. Black people have suffered not only disparate treatment as alleged perpetrators and victims of capital crimes under facially neutral capital statutes, but also explicit racial discrimination under antebellum capital statutes that varied in their application based on the racial status of victims and perpetrators. Following the Civil War, blacks suffered a lengthy era in which lynchings were common, followed by an era of so-called legal lynchings in the South, in which legal protections were minimal at best. Against this backdrop, it is unsurprising that the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund led the constitutional-litigation campaign against the death penalty in the 1960s and 1970s. What is surprising, however, is the Supreme Court's avoidance of the race issue in its foundational constitutional cases. Despite the centrality of racial discrimination in litigants' arguments, the Court consistently avoided direct engagement with the issue of racial discrimination in capital punishment. After surveying the centrality of race both to the history of capital punishment in America and to the litigants' constitutional strategy, we document the Court's strategies of avoidance. We then consider possible explanations for the Court's silence and note some unanticipated consequences of the Court's race-neutral approach to its constitutional regulation of capital punishment.Publication Raising the Bar: Maples v. Thomas and the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel(Harvard Law School, 2013) Steiker, CarolPublication The Marshall Hypothesis Revisited(Howard University School of Law, 2009) Steiker, CarolPublication In Memoriam: William J. Stuntz(Harvard University, Harvard Law School, 2011) Steiker, Carol