Publication: Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: Experiences From the Field and Future Opportunities
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015-09-18
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Slight, Sarah P, Eta S Berner, William L. Galanter, Stanley Huff, Bruce L. Lambert, Carole Lannon, Christoph U Lehmann et al. "Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: Experiences From the Field and Future Opportunities." JMIR Medical Informatics 3, no. 3 (2015): e30. DOI: 10.2196/medinform.4457
Research Data
Abstract
Background
With the aim of improving health care processes through health information technology (HIT), the US government has promulgated requirements for “meaningful use” (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) as a condition for providers receiving financial incentives for the adoption and use of these systems. Considerable uncertainty remains about the impact of these requirements on the effective application of EHR systems.
Objective
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-sponsored Centers for Education and Research in Therapeutics (CERTs) critically examined the impact of the MU policy relating to the use of medications and jointly developed recommendations to help inform future HIT policy.
Methods
We gathered perspectives from a wide range of stakeholders (N=35) who had experience with MU requirements, including academicians, practitioners, and policy makers from different health care organizations including and beyond the CERTs. Specific issues and recommendations were discussed and agreed on as a group.
Results
Stakeholders’ knowledge and experiences from implementing MU requirements fell into 6 domains: (1) accuracy of medication lists and medication reconciliation, (2) problem list accuracy and the shift in HIT priorities, (3) accuracy of allergy lists and allergy-related standards development, (4) support of safer and effective prescribing for children, (5) considerations for rural communities, and (6) general issues with achieving MU. Standards are needed to better facilitate the exchange of data elements between health care settings. Several organizations felt that their preoccupation with fulfilling MU requirements stifled innovation. Greater emphasis should be placed on local HIT configurations that better address population health care needs.
Conclusions
Although MU has stimulated adoption of EHRs, its effects on quality and safety remain uncertain. Stakeholders felt that MU requirements should be more flexible and recognize that integrated models may achieve information-sharing goals in alternate ways. Future certification rules and requirements should enhance EHR functionalities critical for safer prescribing of medications in children.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Health Information Management, Health Informatics
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service