Publication:
Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention Trial: An Efficacy Analysis

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2005

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Heart Association
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Spence, J. David, Heejung Bang, Lloyd E. Chambless, and Meir J. Stampfer. 2005. “Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention Trial.” Stroke 36 (11): 2404–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000185929.38534.f3.

Research Data

Abstract

Background and Purpose - The Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention trial (VISP) intention-to-treat analysis did not show efficacy of combined vitamin therapy for recurrent vascular events in patients with nondisabling stroke. Reasons for lack of efficacy may have included folate fortification of grain products, inclusion of the recommended daily intake for B-12 in the low-dose arm, treatment with parenteral B-12 in patients with low B-12 levels in both study arms, a dose of B-12 too low for patients with malabsorption, supplementation with nonstudy vitamins, and failure of patients with significant renal impairment to respond to vitamin therapy. We conducted an efficacy analysis limited to patients most likely to benefit from the treatment, based on hypotheses arising from evidence developed since VISP was initiated. The criteria for this subgroup were defined before any data analysis.Methods - For this analysis, we excluded patients with low and very high B-12 levels at baseline (< 250 and > 637 pmol/L, representing the 25th and 95th percentiles), to exclude those likely to have B-12 malabsorption or to be taking B-12 supplements outside the study and patients with significant renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate < 46.18; the 10th percentile).Results - This subgroup represents 2155 patients (37% female), with a mean age of 66 +/- 10.7 years. For the combined end point of ischemic stroke, coronary disease, or death, there was a 21% reduction in the risk of events in the high-dose group compared with the low-dose group (unadjusted P = 0.049; adjusted for age, sex, blood pressure, smoking, and B-12 level P = 0.056). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing 4 groups, patients with a baseline B-12 level at the median or higher randomized to high-dose vitamin had the best overall outcome, and those with B-12 less than the median assigned to low-dose vitamin had the worst (P = 0.02 for combined stroke, death, and coronary events; P = 0.03 for stroke and coronary events).Conclusions - In the era of folate fortification, B-12 plays a key role in vitamin therapy for total homocysteine. Higher doses of B-12, and other treatments to lower total homocysteine may be needed for some patients.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories