Publication:
Infections following bispecific antibodies in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2023-09-29

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Society of Hematology
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Reynolds, Gemma, Edward Cliff, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Rakesh Popat, Shonali Midha, Melissa Ng Liet Hing, Simon J. Harrison et al. "Infections following bispecific antibodies in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Blood Advances 7, no. 19 (2023): 5898-5903. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010539

Research Data

Abstract

Bispecific antibodies, a novel immunotherapy with promising efficacy against multiple myeloma, form immune synapses between T-cell surface marker CD3 and malignant cell markers, including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), FcRH5, and G protein–coupled receptor GPRC5D. These bispecific antibodies so effectively deplete plasma cells (and to some extent T-cells) that patients are at increased risk of developing infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infections in published studies of patients with myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies was conducted to better characterize the infection risks. A literature search used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify relevant studies between inception and February 10, 2023, including major conference presentations. Phase 1b-3 clinical trials and observational studies were included. Sixteen clinical trials comprising 1666 patients were included. Median follow-up was 7.6 months and 38% of the cohort had penta-drug refractory disease. Pooled prevalence of all-grade infections was 56%, whereas the prevalence of grade ≥3 infections was 24%. Patients who were treated with BCMA-targeted bispecifics had significantly higher rates of grade ≥3 infections than non-BCMA bispecifics (25% vs 20%). Similarly, patients treated with bispecifics in combination with other agents had significantly higher rate of all-grade infection than those receiving monotherapy (71% vs 52%). In observational studies (n = 293), excluded from the primary analysis to ensure no overlap with patients in clinical trials, several infections classically associated with T-cell depletion were identified. This systematic review identifies BCMA-targeted bispecifics and bispecific combination therapy as having higher infection risk, requiring vigilant infection screening and prophylaxis strategies.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Hematology

Terms of Use

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories