Publication:

Vaccination and screening strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination in Norway: a model-based analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2024-04-20

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Portnoy, A., Pedersen, K., Kim, J.J. et al. Vaccination and screening strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination in Norway: a model-based analysis. Br J Cancer 130, 1951–1959 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02682-y

Abstract

Background: Experts have proposed an ‘EVEN FASTER’ concept targeting age-groups maintaining circulation of human papillomavirus (HPV). We explored effects of the vaccination component of these proposals compared with cervical cancer (CC) screening-based interventions on age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) and CC elimination (<4 cases/100,000) timing in Norway.

Methods: We used a model-based approach to evaluate HPV vaccination and CC screening scenarios compared with a status-quo scenario reflecting previous vaccination and screening. For cohorts ages 25–30 years, we examined 6 vaccination scenarios that incrementally increased vaccination coverage from current cohort-specific rates. Each vaccination scenario was coupled with three screening strategies that varied screening frequency. Additionally, we included 4 scenarios that alternatively increased screening adherence. Population- and cohort-level outcomes included ASR, lifetime risk of CC, and colposcopy referrals.

Results: Several vaccination strategies coupled with de-intensified screening frequencies lowered ASR, but did not accelerate CC elimination. Alternative strategies that increased screening adherence could both accelerate elimination and improve ASR.

Conclusions: The vaccination component of an ‘EVEN FASTER’ campaign is unlikely to accelerate CC elimination in Norway but may reduce population-level ASR. Alternatively, targeting under- and never-screeners may both eliminate CC faster and lead to greater health benefits compared with vaccination-based interventions we considered.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories