Publication:

Reply to: Broad definitions of enforcement are unhelpful for understanding evolutionary mechanisms of cooperation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020-02-10

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Agren, Jon, Nicholas G. Davies, Kevin Foster. "Reply to: Broad definitions of enforcement are unhelpful for understanding evolutionary mechanisms of cooperation." Nat Ecol Evol 4, no. 3 (2020): 323-323. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1112-y

Abstract

While Engelhardt and Taborsky1 agree with the core argument of our recent article2—that enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation—they go on to suggest i) that our use of the word “enforcement” is semantically problematic and ii) that we neglect to distinguish between behavioural manipulations that occur via helping or harming. We find no merit in these points.

Description

This is a Reply to Matters Arising from our paper Ågren JA, Davies NG, and KR Foster. 2019. Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation. Nature Ecology and Evolution.3: 1018–1029, which was previously granted an Open Access Policy Waiver on March 29.

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories