Publication: Loss-of-Function Genetic Tools for Animal Models: Cross-Species and Cross-Platform Differences
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2017-01
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Housden, Benjamin, Matthias Muhar, Matthew Gemberling, Charles A. Gersbach, Didier Y.R. Stainier, Geraldine Seydoux, Stephanie Mohr et al. "Loss-of-Function Genetic Tools for Animal Models: Cross-Species and Cross-Platform Differences." Nature Reviews Genetics 18, no. 1 (2017): 24-40. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.118
Research Data
Abstract
Our understanding of the genetic mechanisms that underlie biological processes has relied extensively on loss-of-function (LOF) analyses. LOF methods target DNA, RNA or protein to reduce or to ablate gene function. By analysing the phenotypes that are caused by these perturbations the wild-type function of genes can be elucidated. Although all LOF methods reduce gene activity the choice of approach (for example, mutagenesis, CRISPR-based gene editing, RNA interference, morpholinos or pharmacological inhibition) can have a major effect on phenotypic outcomes. Interpretation of the LOF phenotype must take into account the biological process that is targeted by each method. The practicality and efficiency of LOF methods also vary considerably between model systems. We describe parameters for choosing the optimal combination of method and system, and for interpreting phenotypes within the constraints of each method.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Research Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCES::Biology::Other biology::Functional genomics
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service