Publication:
Loss-of-Function Genetic Tools for Animal Models: Cross-Species and Cross-Platform Differences

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2017-01

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Housden, Benjamin, Matthias Muhar, Matthew Gemberling, Charles A. Gersbach, Didier Y.R. Stainier, Geraldine Seydoux, Stephanie Mohr et al. "Loss-of-Function Genetic Tools for Animal Models: Cross-Species and Cross-Platform Differences." Nature Reviews Genetics 18, no. 1 (2017): 24-40. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.118

Research Data

Abstract

Our understanding of the genetic mechanisms that underlie biological processes has relied extensively on loss-of-function (LOF) analyses. LOF methods target DNA, RNA or protein to reduce or to ablate gene function. By analysing the phenotypes that are caused by these perturbations the wild-type function of genes can be elucidated. Although all LOF methods reduce gene activity the choice of approach (for example, mutagenesis, CRISPR-based gene editing, RNA interference, morpholinos or pharmacological inhibition) can have a major effect on phenotypic outcomes. Interpretation of the LOF phenotype must take into account the biological process that is targeted by each method. The practicality and efficiency of LOF methods also vary considerably between model systems. We describe parameters for choosing the optimal combination of method and system, and for interpreting phenotypes within the constraints of each method.

Description

Keywords

Research Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCES::Biology::Other biology::Functional genomics

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories