Publication: Evidence revisited: literature on smart specialisation calls for more mixed research designs
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Fellnhofer, Katharina. "Evidence revisited: literature on smart specialisation calls for more mixed research designs." IJKBD 8, no. 3 (2017): 229. DOI: 10.1504/ijkbd.2017.086407
Research Data
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the applied research methods that have been used to examine smart specialisation. For this review, papers from various sources were collected and reviewed multiple times. The findings show that only a few papers applied mixed research methods. Primarily, there are more qualitative than quantitative methods used among papers concerning smart specialisation. More efforts to use mixed methods in smart specialisation could yield findings that are applicable to knowledge-based policymaking. To further illuminate the research discipline of smart specialisation, applying advanced, quantitative research techniques would enrich future efforts of all quadruple helix stakeholders engaged in smart specialisation.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Management of Technology and Innovation, Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service