Publication:
Evidence revisited: literature on smart specialisation calls for more mixed research designs

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Inderscience Publishers
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Fellnhofer, Katharina. "Evidence revisited: literature on smart specialisation calls for more mixed research designs." IJKBD 8, no. 3 (2017): 229. DOI: 10.1504/ijkbd.2017.086407

Research Data

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the applied research methods that have been used to examine smart specialisation. For this review, papers from various sources were collected and reviewed multiple times. The findings show that only a few papers applied mixed research methods. Primarily, there are more qualitative than quantitative methods used among papers concerning smart specialisation. More efforts to use mixed methods in smart specialisation could yield findings that are applicable to knowledge-based policymaking. To further illuminate the research discipline of smart specialisation, applying advanced, quantitative research techniques would enrich future efforts of all quadruple helix stakeholders engaged in smart specialisation.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Management of Technology and Innovation, Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories