Publication:

Rover, Racism and Nativism: A Comparison of Eras of Canine Stereotyping Based on Notions of Nationality, Race and Belonging and Impacted by Canine Identity

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020-03-20

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Komatsu, Jenny C. 2020. Rover, Racism and Nativism: A Comparison of Eras of Canine Stereotyping Based on Notions of Nationality, Race and Belonging and Impacted by Canine Identity. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School.

Abstract

This paper examines and compares three eras of canine stereotyping in the United States and Great Britain, during which certain breeds of dogs were associated with, and conflated with, minority groups experiencing social isolation or targeting. As a result of this identification with human minorities, the specific canine breeds examined were then targeted for media and social campaigns, suffering abuse and discrimination. However, the author hypothesizes that canines themselves have a culture and history, and their own change in social status was a factor in the abuse and discrimination that they experienced.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

spitzes, the spitz, spitz mania, dachshunds, anti-dachshund campaign, WWI propaganda, pit bulls, moral panics, animal rights, dogs, canines, pets, rspca, Michael Vick, racism, nativism, xenophobia, blacks, blackness, wilding, racializing, power of the media, dog fighting, canine identity

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories