Publication: Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2002
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
McCullough, Marjorie L, Diane Feskanich, Meir J Stampfer, Edward L Giovannucci, Eric B Rimm, Frank B Hu, Donna Spiegelman, David J Hunter, Graham A Colditz, and Walter C Willett. 2002. “Diet Quality and Major Chronic Disease Risk in Men and Women: Moving toward Improved Dietary Guidance.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76 (6): 1261–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1261.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: Adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, measured with the US Department of Agriculture Healthy Eating Index (HEI), was associated with only a small reduction in major chronic disease risk. Research suggests that greater reductions in risk are possible with more specific guidance. Objective: We evaluated whether 2 alternate measures of diet quality, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the Recommended Food Score (RFS), would predict chronic disease risk reduction more effectively than did the HEI. Design: A total of 38 615 men from the Health Professional's Follow-up Study and 67 271 women from the Nurses' Health Study completed dietary questionnaires. Major chronic disease was defined as the initial occurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, or nontraurnatic death during 8-12 y of follow-up. Results: High AHEI scores were associated with significant reductions in risk of major chronic disease in men [multivariate relative risk (RR): 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.91] and in women (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.96) when comparing the highest and lowest quintiles. Reductions in risk were particularly strong for CVD in men (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.49,0.75) and in women (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.86). In men but not in women, the RFS predicted risk of major chronic disease (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.04) and CVD (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64,0.93). Conclusions: The AHEI predicted chronic disease risk better than did the RFS (or the HEI, in our previous research) primarily because of a strong inverse association with CVD. Dietary guidelines can be improved by providing more specific and comprehensive advice.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only