Publication:
How consistent are associations between stunting and child development? Evidence from a meta-analysis of associations between stunting and multidimensional child development in fifteen low- and middle-income countries

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Miller, Ann C, Megan B Murray, Dana R Thomson, and Mary Catherine Arbour. 2015. “How Consistent Are Associations between Stunting and Child Development? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis of Associations between Stunting and Multidimensional Child Development in Fifteen Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” Public Health Nutrition 19 (8): 1339–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/s136898001500227x.

Research Data

Abstract

Objective: Despite documented associations between stunting and cognitive development, few population-level studies have measured both indicators in individual children or assessed stunting's associations with other developmental domains. Design: Meta-analysis using publicly available data from fifteen Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS-4) to assess the association between stunting and development, controlling for maternal education, family wealth, books in the home, developmentally supportive parenting and sex of the child, stratified by country prevalence of breast-feeding ('low BF' <90 %, 'high BF' >= 90 %). Ten-item Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) scores assessed physical, learning, literacy/numeracy and socio-emotional developmental domains. Children on track in three or four domains were considered 'on-track' overall. Setting: Fifteen low-and middle-income countries.Subjects: Publically available data from 58 513 children aged 36-59 months. Results: Severe stunting (height-for-age Z-score <-3) was negatively associated with on-track development (OR = 0.75; 95 % CI 0.67, 0.83). Any stunting (Z-score <-2) was negatively associated with on-track development in countries with high BF prevalence (OR = 0.82; 95 % CI 0.75, 0.89). Severe and any stunting were negatively associated with physical development (OR = 0.77; 95 % CI 0.66, 0.89 and OR = 0.82; 95 % CI 0.74, 0.91, respectively) and literacy/numeracy development in high BF countries (OR = 0.45; 95 % CI 0.38, 0.53 and OR = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.51, 0.68, respectively), but not low BF countries (OR = 0.93; 95 % CI 0.70, 1.23 and OR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.79, 1.12, respectively). Any stunting was negatively associated with learning (OR = 0.79; 95 % CI 0.72, 0.88). There was no clear association between stunting and socio-emotional development. Conclusions: Stunting is associated with many but not all developmental domains across a diversity of countries and cultures. However, associations varied by country breast-feeding prevalence and developmental domain.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories

Story
How consistent are associations between stunting… : DASH Story 2020-11-30
I am a doctor from India, doing my postgraduation in Community Medicine/Preventive and Social Medicine. I am so grateful to DASH for making this article Open Access. I would not have been able to pay for it otherwise.